Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care

Author:

Snudden Claudia MORCID,Calanzani NataliaORCID,Archer StephanieORCID,Honey StephanieORCID,Pannebakker Merel MORCID,Faher Anissa,Chang Aina,Hamilton WillieORCID,Walter Fiona MORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesThe faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is increasingly used in UK primary care to triage patients presenting with symptoms and at different levels of colorectal cancer risk. Evidence is scarce on patients’ views of using FIT in this context. We aimed to explore patients’ care experience and acceptability of using FIT in primary care.DesignA qualitative semi-structured interview study. Interviews were conducted via Zoom between April and October 2020. Transcribed recordings were analysed using framework analysis.SettingEast of England general practices.ParticipantsConsenting patients (aged ≥40 years) who presented in primary care with possible symptoms of colorectal cancer, and for whom a FIT was requested, were recruited to the FIT-East study. Participants were purposively sampled for this qualitative substudy based on age, gender and FIT result.Results44 participants were interviewed with a mean age 61 years, and 25 (57%) being men: 8 (18%) received a positive FIT result. Three themes and seven subthemes were identified. Participants’ familiarity with similar tests and perceived risk of cancer influenced test experience and acceptability. All participants were happy to do the FIT themselves and to recommend it to others. Most participants reported that the test was straightforward, although some considered it may be a challenge to others. However, test explanation by healthcare professionals was often limited. Furthermore, while some participants received their results quickly, many did not receive them at all with the common assumption that ‘no news is good news’. For those with a negative result and persisting symptoms, there was uncertainty about any next steps.ConclusionsWhile FIT is acceptable to patients, elements of communication with patients by the healthcare system show potential for improvement. We suggest possible ways to improve the FIT experience, particularly regarding communication about the test and its results.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme

Cancer Research UK

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference47 articles.

1. WCRF International . Colorectal cancer statistics. n.d. Available: https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/colorectal-cancer-statistics/

2. NICE . Recommendations | quantitative faecal immunochemical tests to guide referral for colorectal cancer in primary care | guidance | NICE. 2022. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg30/chapter/1-Recommendations

3. Advances in Fecal Occult Blood Tests: The FIT Revolution

4. The nature and frequency of abdominal symptoms in cancer patients and their associations with time to help-seeking: evidence from a national audit of cancer diagnosis;Koo;J Public Health (Oxf),2018

5. Colorectal Cancer Initial Diagnosis: Screening Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Colonoscopy, or Emergent Surgery, and Tumor Stage and Size at Initial Presentation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3