Systematic review on the involvement and engagement of patients as advisers for the organisation of organ transplantation services

Author:

Qu ZhiORCID,Oedingen Carina,Bartling Tim,Krauth Christian,Schrem Harald

Abstract

ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to derive practical lessons from publications on patient involvement and engagement in the organisation of organ transplantation services.DesignThis systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Inclusion criteria for the analysis of publications in English cited in the databases PubMed and Web of Science until 6 December 2022 required that patients participated as advisers in the organisation of organ transplantation services. Quality assessment was performed using the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP) 2 small form and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for the assessment of the risks of bias.ResultsDeployed search strings identified 2263 records resulting in a total of 11 articles. The aims and strategies, deployed methods, observed effects, observed barriers and proposed improvements for the future varied vastly. All reported that well-developed programmes involving and engaging patients at an organisational level provide additional benefits for patients and foster patient-centred care. Lessons learnt include: (1) to empower patients, the information provided to them should be individualised to prioritise their needs; (2) financial as well as organisational resources are important to successfully implement patient involvement and engagement; (3) systematic feedback from patients in organisational structures to health providers is required to improve clinical workflows and (4) the consideration of ethical issues and the relationship between investigators and participating patients should be clarified and reported.ConclusionsActionable management recommendations could be derived. The quantitative impact on clinical outcome and economic clinical process improvements remains to be investigated. Study quality can be improved using the GRIPP 2 guidance and the CASP tool.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022186467.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference68 articles.

1. From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement

2. Community participation in health service reform: the development of an innovative remote Aboriginal primary health-care service;Reeve;Aust J Prim Health,2015

3. Ruth A . Vision 20-30—building an Australian cancer futures framework: National Oncology Alliance and Rare Cancers Australia 2020. Available: https://rcararecancers.blob.core.windows.net/assets/pages/NOA_Vision20-30%20FA%20r4%20Digital.pdf [Accessed 25 Oct 2022].

4. Murphy L , Wells JS , Lachman P , et al . A quality improvement initiative in community mental health in the Republic of Ireland. Health Science Journal 2015;9.

5. Developing a nurse-led integrated "red legs'' service;Elwell;Br J Community Nurs,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Designing a Blockchain-Enabled Organ Donation Model for Enhanced Transparency and Trust;2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS);2024-04-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3