Assessment of patients’ preferences for new anticancer drugs in China: a best–worst discrete choice experiment on three common cancer types

Author:

Feng Zhe,Meng Jingyi,Sun Yanjun,Xie Tongling,Lu Wenzhang,Wang Guohua,Geng JinsongORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesDespite the advancement in anticancer drug therapies, cancer treatment decisions are often complex and preference-sensitive, making them well suited for studying shared decision-making (SDM). Our study aimed to assess preferences for new anticancer drugs among three common types of patients with cancer to inform SDM.DesignWe identified five attributes of new anticancer drugs and used a Bayesian-efficient design to generate choice sets for a best–worst discrete choice experiment (BWDCE). The mixed logit regression model was applied to estimate patient-reported preferences for each attribute. The interaction model was used to investigate preference heterogeneity.SettingThe BWDCE was conducted in Jiangsu province and Hebei province in China.ParticipantsPatients aged 18 years or older, who had a definite diagnosis of lung cancer, breast cancer or colorectal cancer were recruited.ResultsData from 468 patients were available for analysis. On average, the most valued attribute was the improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (p<0.001). The low incidence of severe to life-threatening side effects, prolonged progression-free survival and the low incidence of mild to moderate side effects were also positive predictors of patients’ preferences (p<0.001). Out-of-pocket cost was a negative predictor of their preferences (p<0.001). According to subgroup analysis by type of cancer, the improvement in HRQoL remained the most valuable attribute. However, the relative importance of other attributes varied by type of cancer. Whether patients were newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed cancer cases played a dominant role in the preference heterogeneity within each subgroup.ConclusionsOur study can assist in the implementation of SDM by providing evidence on patients’ preferences for new anticancer drugs. Patients should be informed of the multiattribute values of new drugs and encouraged to make decisions reflecting their values.

Funder

MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences

Science and Technology Project of Nantong City

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. STUDY OF ACUTE TOXICITY OF THE SUBSTANCE 2-(1,1-DIMETHYL-1H-BENZO[E]INDOLIN-2-YL)-5,6,7-TRICHLORO-1,3-TROPOLONE ON IMMUNODEFICIENCY MICE OF THE BALB/C NUDE LINE;Поколение будущего: сборник статей XLVIII международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Январь 2024);2024-03-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3