Lived experience of people with lateral elbow tendinopathy: a qualitative study from the OPTimisE pilot and feasibility trial

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the lived experience of people with lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) and its impact on everyday life.DesignQualitative semi-structured interviews, analysed using thematic analysis.SettingConducted as part of the mixed-methods OPTimisE pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial of outpatient physiotherapy patients in the UK.Participants17 participants with LET, purposively sampled from the trial to provide representativeness based on age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation index and treatment allocation.ResultsFour themes were identified from the participants’ responses: (1) cause of onset—typically symptoms were attributed to: sudden changes in activity, repetitive work or compensating for other musculoskeletal conditions; (2) impact on everyday life—which included substantial impacts on quality-of-life, particularly due to pain disturbing sleep and difficulties performing daily tasks (related to work and hobbies) due to pain, although most reported being able to persevere with work; (3) self-help and understanding of the condition—with uncertainty about the appropriateness and potential harm of online advice and confusion from the diagnostic term ‘Tennis Elbow’ that non-sporting individuals struggled to relate to; (4) healthcare experiences—the treatments received were highly variable and often perceived as ineffectual.ConclusionsFor the first time, the lived experience of people from a range of backgrounds suffering from LET has been explored. Findings suggest that people frequently related the cause to a specific activity. They reported substantial impacts on daily tasks, sleep, work and hobbies. People also reported hesitancy to trust online information without formal healthcare advice, were confused by the common label of ‘Tennis Elbow’, and perceived the wide array of healthcare treatment options they had received to offer false hope and be largely ineffective. This study provides stimulus for clinicians to consider the advice and treatment provided, and whether the messages conveyed reflect the favourable natural history of the condition.Trial registration numberISRCTN64444585