What are the experiences of seeking, receiving and providing FGM-related healthcare? Perspectives of health professionals and women/girls who have undergone FGM: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence

Author:

Evans Catrin,Tweheyo RitahORCID,McGarry Julie,Eldridge Jeanette,McCormick Carol,Nkoyo Valentine,Higginbottom Gina Marie Awoko

Abstract

IntroductionFemale genital mutilation (FGM) is an issue of global concern. High levels of migration mean that healthcare systems in higher-income western countries are increasingly being challenged to respond to the care needs of affected communities. Research has identified significant challenges in the provision of, and access to, FGM-related healthcare. There is a lack of confidence and competence among health professionals in providing appropriate care, suggesting an urgent need for evidence-based service development in this area. This study will involve two systematic reviews of qualitative evidence to explore the experiences, needs, barriers and facilitators to seeking and providing FGM-related healthcare in high-income (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries, from the perspectives of: (1) women and girls who have undergone FGM and (2) health professionals.Review methodsTwelve databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, Web of Science, ERIC, CINAHL, and POPLINE will be searched with no limits on publication year. Relevant grey literature will be identified from digital sources and professional networks.Two reviewers will independently screen, select and critically appraise the studies. Study quality will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument appraisal tool. Findings will be extracted into NVivo software. Synthesis will involve inductive thematic analysis, including in-depth reading, line by line coding of the findings, development of descriptive themes and re-coding to higher level analytical themes. Confidence in the review findings will be assessed using the CERQual approach. Findings will be integrated into a comprehensive set of recommendations for research, policy and practice.DisseminationThe syntheses will be reported as per the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. Two reviews will be published in peer-reviewed journals and an integrated report disseminated at stakeholder engagement events.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42015030001: 2015 and CRD42015030004: 2015.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Health Service Research and Delivery Programme

Publisher

BMJ

Reference84 articles.

1. World Health Organisation. WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. Geneva: WHO, 2016.

2. United Nations Children’s Fund. Female genital mutilation and cutting: a global concern. New York: UNICEF, 2016.

3. World Health Organisation. A systematic review of the health complications of female genital mutilation including sequelae in childbirth. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2000.

4. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Berg;BMJ Open,2014

5. Berg RC , Denison E , Fretheim A . Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genitalmutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review of quantitative studies . Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC), 2010.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3