Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry)

Author:

Onorati Francesco,Gherli Riccardo,Mariscalco Giovanni,Girdauskas Evaldas,Quintana Eduardo,Santini Francesco,De Feo Marisa,Sponga Sandro,Tozzi Piergiorgio,Bashir Mohamad,Perrotti Andrea,Pappalardo Aniello,Ruggieri Vito Giovanni,Santarpino Giuseppe,Rinaldi Mauro,Ronaldo Silva,Nicolini Francesco

Abstract

IntroductionTraditional and transcatheter surgical treatments of severe aortic valve stenosis (SAVS) are increasing in parallel with the improved life expectancy. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported comparable or non-inferior mortality with transcatheter treatments compared with traditional surgery. However, RCTs have the limitation of being a mirror of the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, without reflecting the ‘real clinical world’. Technological improvements have recently allowed the development of minimally invasive surgical accesses and the use of sutureless valves, but their impact on the clinical scenario is difficult to assess because of the monocentric design of published studies and limited sample size. A prospective multicentre registry including all patients referred for a surgical treatment of SAVS (traditional, through full sternotomy; minimally invasive; or transcatheter; with both ‘sutured’ and ‘sutureless’ valves) will provide a ‘real-world’ picture of available results of current surgical options and will help to clarify the ‘grey zones’ of current guidelines.Methods and analysisEuropean Aortic Valve Registry is a prospective observational open registry designed to collect all data from patients admitted for SAVS, with or without coronary artery disease, in 16 cardiac surgery centres located in six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and UK). Patients will be enrolled over a 2-year period and followed up for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 10 years after enrolment. Outcome definitions are concordant with Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria and established guidelines. Primary outcome is 5-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes aim at establishing ‘early’ 30-day all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major morbidity, and ‘late’ cardiovascular mortality, major morbidity, structural and non-structural valve complications, quality of life and echocardiographic results.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol is approved by local ethics committees. Any formal presentation or publication of data will be considered as a joint publication by the participating physician(s) and will follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for authorship.Trial registration numberNCT03143361; Pre-results.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the euro heart survey on valvular heart disease;Iung;Eur Heart J,2003

2. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology;Vahanian;Eur Heart J,2007

3. Excellent early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement in people aged 80 and older;Filsoufi;J Am Geriatr Soc,2008

4. High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted?;Grossi;Ann Thorac Surg,2008

5. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients;Smith;N Engl J Med,2011

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3