Protocol for a national prevalence study of advance care planning documentation and self-reported uptake in Australia

Author:

Ruseckaite Rasa,Detering Karen M,Evans Sue MORCID,Perera Veronica,Walker Lynne,Sinclair Craig,Clayton Josephine M,Nolte Linda

Abstract

IntroductionAdvance care planning (ACP) is a process between a person, their family/carer(s) and healthcare providers that supports adults at any age or stage of health in understanding and sharing their personal values, life goals and preferences regarding future medical care. The Australian government funds a number of national initiatives aimed at increasing ACP uptake; however, there is currently no standardised Australian data on formal ACP documentation or self-reported uptake. This makes it difficult to evaluate the impact of ACP initiatives. This study aims to determine the Australian national prevalence of ACP and completion of Advance Care Directives (ACDs) in hospitals, aged care facilities and general practices. It will also explore people’s self-reported use of ACP and views about the process.Methods and analysisResearchers will conduct a national multicentre cross-sectional prevalence study, consisting of a record audit and surveys of people aged 65 years or more in three sectors. From 49 participating Australian organisations, 50 records will be audited (total of 2450 records). People whose records were audited, who speak English and have a decision-making capacity will also be invited to complete a survey. The primary outcome measure will be the number of people who have formal or informal ACP documentation that can be located in records within 15 min. Other outcomes will include demographics, measure of illness and functional capacity, details of ACP documentation (including type of document), location of documentation in the person’s records and whether current clinical care plans are consistent with ACP documentation. People will be surveyed, to measure self-reported interest, uptake and use of ACP/ACDs, and self-reported quality of life.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (reference HREC/17/Austin/83). Results will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.Trial registration numberACTRN12617000743369

Funder

Australian Government

Publisher

BMJ

Reference31 articles.

1. Sudore RL , Lum HD , You JJ , et al . Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017;53.doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331

2. The Australian Commission of Quality and Safety in Health Care. The National Consensus Statement: Essential elements for safe and high-quality end-of-life care. Australia: The Australian Commission of Quality and Safety in Health Care(accessed Nov 2016).

3. Detering K . Accessibility of Advance Care Plans in Victoria – A Summary Options Paper. Melbourne: Advance Care Planning Australia, 2017.

4. Carter RZ , Detering KM , Silvester W , et al . Advance care planning in Australia: what does the law say? Aust Health Rev 2015.doi:10.1071/AH15120

5. Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council. Clinical, Technical and Ethical Principal Committee (issuing body). A national framework for advance care directives. Canberra: Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council, 2011.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3