Adjusting working conditions and evaluating the risk of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic in different workplace settings in Germany: a study protocol for an explorative modular mixed methods approach

Author:

Rind EstherORCID,Kimpel Klaus,Preiser Christine,Papenfuss Falko,Wagner Anke,Alsyte Karina,Siegel Achim,Klink Antje,Steinhilber Benjamin,Kauderer Johanna,Rieger Monika A

Abstract

IntroductionCurrently, many countries, affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, discuss how the ‘lockdown-restrictions’ could be lifted to restart the economy and public life after the first wave of the COVID-19 disease has subsided. This study protocol describes an approach designed to provide an in-depth understanding of how companies and their employees in Germany deal with their working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. We are also interested in how and why the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 could vary across different professional activities, company sites and regions with different epidemiological activity or infection control measures in Germany. We expect the results of this study to contribute to the development of working conditions protecting the health of employees during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods and analysisAn explorative multimodal mixed methods approach will be applied. Module 1 comprises a document analysis of prevailing federal and regional laws and regulations at the respective location of the participating company. Module 2 includes qualitative interviews with key actors at different companies. Module 3 is a repeated standardised employee survey designed to capture potential changes in the participants’ experiences and attitudes towards working conditions, occupational safety regulations/measures, and infection control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Module 4 comprises SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence testing. This is carried out by the medical service of the participating company sites as a voluntary offer for employees. Qualitative data will be analysed through document and content analysis. The complexity of the quantitative analysis depends on the response rates of modules 3 and 4.Ethics and disseminationThe approval of the study design was received in June 2020 from the responsible local ethical committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen and University Hospital Tübingen (No. 423/2020BO). The results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Funder

Employers’ Association of the Metal and Electric Industry Baden-Wuerttemberg

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. World Health Organization . Coronavirus. Available: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1 [Accessed 19 May 2020].

2. Dorn F , Khailaie S , Stöckli M . [The common interest of health and economy: A scenario calculation for the containment of the corona pandemic. A joint study of the ifo Institute (ifo) and the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI). In: Ifo Schnelldienst digital. München: ifo Institut, 2020.

3. Tagesschau . [VW shutting down again - news from 13.05.2020]. Available: https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/vw-produktion-105.html [Accessed 19 May 2020].

4. Veitinger T . [Bosch - environmental protection despite pandemic. Heidenheim News from 30.04.2020]. Available: https://www.hz.de/wirtschaft/wirtschaft-ueberregional/umweltschutz-trotz-pandemie-45870919.html [Accessed 19 May 2020].

5. Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: a bibliometric analysis approach;Verma;J Bus Res,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3