German primary care data collection projects: a scoping review

Author:

Moser KonstantinORCID,Massag Janka,Frese Thomas,Mikolajczyk Rafael,Christoph Jan,Pushpa Joshi,Straube Johanna,Unverzagt SusanneORCID

Abstract

BackgroundThe widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs) has led to a growing number of large routine primary care data collection projects globally, making these records a valuable resource for health services and epidemiological and clinical research. This scoping review aims to comprehensively assess and compare strengths and limitations of all German primary care data collection projects and relevant research publications that extract data directly from practice management systems (PMS).MethodsA literature search was conducted in the electronic databases in May 2021 and in June 2022. The search string included terms related to general practice, routine data, and Germany. The retrieved studies were classified as applied studies and methodological studies, and categorised by type of research, subject area, sample of publications, disease category, or main medication analysed.ResultsA total of 962 references were identified, with 241 studies included from six German projects in which databases are populated by EHRs from PMS. The projects exhibited significant heterogeneity in terms of size, data collection methods, and variables collected. The majority of the applied studies (n = 205, 85%) originated from one database with a primary focus on pharmacoepidemiological topics (n = 127, 52%) including prescription patterns (n = 68, 28%) and studies about treatment outcomes, compliance, and treatment effectiveness (n = 34, 14%). Epidemiological studies (n = 77, 32%) mainly focused on incidence and prevalence studies (n = 41, 17%) and risk and comorbidity analysis studies (n = 31, 12%). Only 10% (n = 23) of studies were in the field of health services research, such as hospitalisation.ConclusionThe development and durability of primary care data collection projects in Germany is hindered by insufficient public funding, technical issues of data extraction, and strict data protection regulations. There is a need for further research and collaboration to improve the usability of EHRs for health services and research.

Publisher

BMJ

Reference40 articles.

1. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) . FAQ: what is an electronic health record. 2023. Available: https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr#:~:text=An%20electronic%20health%20record%20(EHR)%20is%20a%20digital%20version%20of,and%20securely%20to%20authorized%20users

2. The value of electronic health records since the health information technology for economic and clinical health act: systematic review;Modi;JMIR Med Inform,2022

3. Use of EHRs data for clinical research: historical progress and current applications;Nordo;Learn Health Syst,2019

4. Factors influencing the development of primary care data collection projects from electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature;Gentil;BMC Med Inform Decis Mak,2017

5. Sonderheft methodische Aspekte der Sekundärdatenanalyse;Swart;Gesundheitswesen,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3