Multinational trends in sepsis mortality between 1985 and 2019: a temporal analysis of the WHO Mortality Database

Author:

Komorowski Matthieu,Salciccioli Justin D,Shalhoub Joseph,Gordon Anthony C,Marshall Dominic C

Abstract

ObjectivesUnderstanding the burden of disease of sepsis is essential for monitoring the effectiveness of international strategies to improve sepsis care. Our objective was to describe the multinational trend of sepsis-related mortality for the period 1985–2019 from the WHO Mortality Database.DesignRetrospective analysis of the WHO Mortality Database.SettingWe included data from all countries defined by the WHO as having ‘high usability data’ and at least 10 years of total available data.ParticipantsFrom the WHO list of 50 countries with high usability data, 14 (28%) were excluded due to excessive missingness. We included and analysed data separately for male and female.Primary and secondary outcome measuresWe analysed age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR) (weighted average of the age-specific mortality rates per 100 000 people, where the weights are the proportions of people in the corresponding age groups of the WHO standard population).ResultsWe included 1104 country-years worth of data from 36 countries with high usability data, accounting for around 15% of the world’s population. The median ASMR for men decreased from 37.8 deaths/100 000 (IQR 28.4–46.7) in 1985–1987 to 25.8 deaths/100 000 (IQR 19.2–37) in 2017–2019, an approximately 12% absolute (31.8% relative) decrease. For women, the overall ASMR decreased from 22.9 deaths/100 000 (IQR 17.7–32.2) to 16.2 deaths/100 000 (IQR 12.6–21.6), an approximately 6.7% absolute decrease (29.3% relative decrease). The analysis of country-level data revealed wide variations in estimates and trends.ConclusionsWe observed a decrease in reported sepsis-related mortality across the majority of analysed nations between 1985 and 2019. However, significant variability remains between gender and health systems. System-level and population-level factors may contribute to these differences, and additional investigations are necessary to further explain these trends.

Funder

Imperial Biomedical Research Centre

MRC clinical research training fellowship

NIHR

British Heart Foundation

Mittal Fund at Cleveland Clinic Philanthropy

Publisher

BMJ

Reference33 articles.

1. Comparing the validity of different ICD coding abstraction strategies for sepsis case identification in German claims data;Fleischmann-Struzek;PLoS One,2018

2. Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management;Gotts;BMJ,2016

3. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study;Rudd;The Lancet,2020

4. Torio CM , Andrews RM . National inpatient hospital costs: the most expensive conditions by payer, 2011: statistical brief #160. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) statistical briefs. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US), 2013.

5. Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in Sepsis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3