Abstract
ObjectivesWe aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the first known online asynchronous multiple mini-interview (MMI) designed for fairness with subgroup analyses by key characteristics, usability and acceptability.DesignCross-discipline multimethod evaluation.SettingOne UK University.ParticipantsApplicants to nursing, midwifery and paramedic science undergraduate programmes during 2021–2022.Primary, secondary outcome measuresPsychometric properties (internal consistency, construct validity, dimensionality) were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha (α), parallel analysis (PA), Schmid-Leiman transformation and ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Usability and acceptability were evaluated using descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis.MethodsThe system was configured in a seven question 4 min MMI. Applicants’ videorecorded their answers which were later assessed by interviewers and scores summed. Applicants and interviewers completed online evaluation questionnaires.ResultsPerformance data from 712 applicants determined good-excellent reliability for the asynchronous MMI (mean α 0.72) with similar results across subgroups (gender, age, disability/support needs, UK/non-UK). PA and factor analysis results suggested there were seven factors relating to the MMI questions with an underlying general factor that explained the variance in observed candidate responses. A CFA testing a seven-factor hierarchical model showed an excellent fit to the data (Confirmatory Fit Index=0.99), Tucker Lewis Index=0.99, root mean square error (RMSE) =0.034). Applicants (n=210) viewed the flexibility, relaxed environment and cost savings advantageous. Interviewers (n=65) reported the system to be intuitive, flexible with >70% time saved compared with face-to-face interviews. Reduced personal communication was cited as the principal disadvantage.ConclusionsWe found that the asynchronous MMI was reliable, time-efficient, fair and acceptable and building fairness in was lost-cost. These novel, insights are applicable across health professions selection internationally informing the future configuration of online interviews to ensure workforces represent the societies they serve.
Reference32 articles.
1. Council of Deans of Health Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion, Available: https://www.councilofdeans.org.uk/category/policy/equality-diversity-and-inclusion
2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs 17 Sustainable Development Goals, Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
3. The post-COVID-19 rise in labour shortages. n.d. Available: https://www.oecd.org/publications/the-post-covid-19-rise-in-labour-shortages-e60c2d1c-en.htm
4. Implementation and evaluation of virtual multiple mini interviews as a selection tool for entry into Paediatric postgraduate training: A Queensland experience;Sabesan;Medical Teacher,2022
5. COVID-19: designing and conducting an on-line mini-multiple interview (MMI) in a dynamic landscape;Cleland;Med Teach,2020