Abstract
Introduction
Sepsis and septic shock have mortality rates between 20% and 50%. In
sepsis, the immune response becomes dysregulated, which leads to an
imbalance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators. When
standard therapeutic measures fail to improve patients’ condition,
additional therapeutic alternatives are applied to reduce morbidity and
mortality. One of the most recent alternatives is extracorporeal
cytokine adsorption with a device called CytoSorb. This study aims to
compare the efficacy of standard medical therapy and continuous
extracorporeal cytokine removal with CytoSorb therapy in patients with
early refractory septic shock. Furthermore, we compare the dosing of
CytoSorb adsorber device changed every 12 or 24 hours.
Methods and analysis
It is a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label,
international, multicentre, phase III study. Patients fulfilling the
inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to receive standard medical
therapy (group A) or—in addition to standard treatment—CytoSorb therapy.
CytoSorb treatment will be continuous and last for at least 24 hours,
CytoSorb adsorber device will be changed every 12 (group B) or 24 hours
(group C). Our primary outcome is shock reversal (no further need or a
reduced (≤10% of the maximum dose) vasopressor requirement for 3 hours)
and time to shock reversal (number of hours elapsed from the start of
the treatment to shock reversal).
Based on sample size calculation, 135 patients (1:1:1) will need to
be enrolled in the study. A predefined interim analysis will be
performed after reaching 50% of the planned sample size, therefore, the
corrected level of significance (p value) will be 0.0294.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval was obtained from the Scientific and Research Ethics
Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (OGYÉI/65049/2020).
Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed
journal.
Trial registration number
NCT04742764; Pre-results.
Funder
Pécsi
Tudományegyetem
European
Commission, Economic Development and Innovation Operational
Programme
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献