Abstract
ObjectivesTo investigate the perceptions and experiences of people with specific immune-mediated inflammatory diseases during the process of switching from Humira to biosimilar adalimumab.DesignCross-sectional survey.SettingAn anonymised, self-administered, web-based survey.ParticipantsThe participants were drawn from members and non-members of either the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, the National Axial Spondyloarthritis Society, Crohn’s and Colitis UK, or Psoriasis Association. Birdshot Uveitis Society and Olivia’s Vision also signposted to the survey links.ResultsA total of 899 people living with various immune mediated inflammatory diseases participated in this survey. Thirty-four per cent of respondents reported poor overall satisfaction with their biosimilar adalimumab after the switch, associated with complaints related to the switching process including lack of shared decision making, scarcity of information provided by or signposted to by the department instigating the switch as well as lack of training with the new injection device. Where training with the new device had been provided, there were significantly reduced reports of pain when injecting the new biosimilar (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.55), side effects (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.47) and difficulty in using the new injection device (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.41). Self-reported side effects were reduced by (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.38) when written information was provided by healthcare professionals and by (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.42) with provision of verbal information. Difficulty in using the new injection device was also reduced by provision of satisfactory information such as written documents (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.63) or by verbal communication with healthcare professionals (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.73). Finally, provision of satisfactory written or verbal information was associated with a reduction in any negative perception regarding symptom control with the new biosimilar by (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.57) and by (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.84), respectively.ConclusionsPatient reported experiences of the process of switching from originator to biosimilar emphasise the importance of clear communication, training and information in order to optimise perception and maximise achievable outcomes with the new treatment.
Reference24 articles.
1. Robinson J . The pharmaceutical Journal. Available: https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/ article/feature/preparing-for-the-big-biologic-switch
2. Medicines Diagnostics and Personalised Medicine Policy Team, National Medical Directorate, NHS England . Commissioning framework for biological medicines (including biosimilar medicines), 2017. Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/biosimilar-medicines-commissioning-framework.pdf [Accessed 29 Apr 2020].
3. Medicines and Diagnostics Policy Unit, NHS England . Commissioning intentions: adalimumab, 2018. Available: https://www.sps.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/20180925-Contractual-Commissioning-Intentions-Adalimumab_corporate-template.pdf [Accessed 29 Apr 2020].
4. Perception of Originator biologics and biosimilars: a survey among Belgian rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists;van Overbeeke;BioDrugs,2017
5. Patients' understanding and attitudes towards infliximab and etanercept biosimilars: result of a UK web-based survey;Aladul;BioDrugs,2017
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献