Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review

Author:

Ritschel MichaelaORCID,Kuske Silke,Gnass Irmela,Andrich Silke,Moschinski Kai,Borgmann Sandra Olivia,Herrmann-Frank Annegret,Metzendorf Maria-Inti,Wittgens Charlotte,Flohé Sascha,Sturm Johannes,Windolf Joachim,Icks Andrea

Abstract

ObjectivesWe (1) collected instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) described their use and (3) investigated other relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in the studies.DesignSystematic Review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, as well as the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP were searched from January 2005 to April 2018.Eligibility criteriaAll original empirical research published in English or German including PROs of patients aged 18–75 years with an Injury Severity Score≥16 and/or an Abbreviated Injury Scale≥3. Studies with defined injuries or diseases (e.g. low-energy injuries) and some text types (e.g. grey literature and books) were excluded. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded, but references screened for appropriate studies.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction, narrative content analysis and a critical appraisal (e.g. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were performed by two reviewers independently.ResultsThe search yielded 3496 hits; 54 publications were included. Predominantly, HRQoL was assessed, with Short Form-36 Health Survey applied most frequently. ADL and (social) participation were rarely assessed. The methods most used were postal surveys and single assessments of PROs, with a follow-up period of one to one and a half years. Other relevant PRO areas reported were function, mental disorders and pain.ConclusionsThere is a large variation in the assessment of PROs after polytrauma, impairing comparability of outcomes. First efforts to standardise the collection of PROs have been initiated, but require further harmonisation between central players. Additional knowledge on rarely reported PRO areas (e.g. (social) participation, social networks) may lead to their consideration in health services provision.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017060825.

Funder

Academy for Trauma Surgery GmbH

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference103 articles.

1. Prevalence and Prognostic Factors of Disability After Major Trauma

2. How to define severely injured patients?—An Injury Severity Score (ISS) based approach alone is not sufficient;Paffrath;Injury,2014

3. [Quality of life after multiple trauma];Mörsdorf;Chirurg,2014

4. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie eV . [Weißbuch Schwerverletztenversorgung], 2019. Available: https://www.dgu-online.de/q-s/schwerverletzte/weissbuch-schwerverletztenversorgung.html

5. Sektion Notfall- & Intensivmedizin & Schwerverletztenversorgung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V. und AUC - Akademie der Unfallchirurgie GmbH . [TraumaRegister DGU® - Jahresbericht 2020], 2020. Available: http://www.traumaregister-dgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/traumaregister-dgu.de/docs/Downloads/Jahresbericht_2020.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3