Emergency contracting and the delivery of elective care services across the English National Health Service and independent sector during COVID-19: a descriptive analysis

Author:

Friebel RoccoORCID,Fistein Jon,Maynou Laia,Anderson Michael

Abstract

BackgroundFollowing a virtual standstill in the delivery of elective procedures in England, a national block contract between the NHS and the independent sector aimed to help restart surgical care. This study aims to describe subsequent changes in trends in elective care service delivery following implementation of the initial iteration of this contract.MethodsPopulation-based retrospective cohort study, assessing the delivery of all publicly funded and privately funded elective care delivered in England between 1 April 2020 and 31 July 2020 compared with the same period in 2019. Discharge data from the Hospital Episode Statistics and private healthcare data from the Private Health Information Network was stratified by specialty, procedure, length of stay and patient complexity in terms of age and Charlson Comorbidity Index.ResultsCOVID-19 significantly reduced publicly funded elective care activity, though changes were more pronounced in the independent sector (−65.1%) compared with the NHS (−52.7%), whereas reductions in privately funded elective care activity were similar in both independent sector hospitals (−74.2%) and NHS hospitals (−72.9%). Patient complexity increased in the independent sector compared with the previous year, with mixed findings in NHS hospitals. Most specialties, irrespective of sector or funding mechanisms, experienced a reduction in hospital admissions. However, some specialities, including medical oncology, clinical oncology, clinical haematology and cardiology, experienced an increase in publicly-funded elective care activity in the independent sector.ConclusionElective care delivered by the independent sector remained significantly below historic levels, although this overlooks significant variation between regions and specialities. There may be opportunities to learn from regions which achieved more significant increases in publicly funded elective care in independent sector providers as a strategy to address the growing backlog of elective care.

Funder

London School of Economics and Political Science

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Arora S , Charleworth A , Kelly E . Public payment and private provision. IFS and Nuffield Trust, 2013.

2. Stoye G . Recent trends in independent sector provision of NHS-funded elective hospital care in England [Internet], 2019. Available: https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/14593 [Accessed 21 May 2021].

3. The King’s Fund . Is the NHS being privatised? [Internet], 2021. Available: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/articles/big-election-questions-nhs-privatised [Accessed 21 May 2021].

4. Independent sector providers in the NHS [Internet] . The British Medical association is the trade Union and professional body for doctors in the UK. Available: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/nhs-delivery-and-workforce/commissioning/independent-sector-providers-in-the-nhs [Accessed 21 May 2021].

5. Independent sector treatment centres: evidence so far

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3