Abstract
Objectives
Develop and validate short and rapid forms of the 36-item Menstrual
Practice Needs Scale (MPNS-36).
Design
Item reduction prioritised content validity and was informed by
cognitive interviews with schoolgirls in Bangladesh, performance of
scale items in past research and stakeholder feedback. The original
MPNS-36 was revalidated, and short and rapid forms tested in a
cross-sectional survey. This was followed by further tests of
dimensionality, internal consistency and validity in multiple
cross-sectional surveys.
Setting and participants
Short form (MPNS-SF) and rapid form (MPNS-R) measures were developed
in a survey of 313 menstruating girls (mean age=13.51) in Khulna,
Bangladesh. They were further tested in the baseline survey of the
Adolescent Menstrual Experiences and Health Cohort, in Khulna,
Bangladesh (891 menstruating girls, mean age=12.40); and the dataset
from the MPNS-36 development in Soroti, Uganda (538 menstruating girls,
mean age=14.49).
Results
The 18-item short form reflects the six original subscales, with the
four core subscales demonstrating good fit in all three samples (Khulna
pilot: root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.064, 90% CI
0.043 to 0.084, Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.94, Tucker-Lewis Index
(TLI)=0.92. Cohort baseline: RMSEA=0.050, 90% CI 0.039 to 0.062,
CFI=0.96, TLI=0.95. Uganda: RMSEA=0.039, 90% CI 0.028 to 0.050,
CFI=0.95, TLI=0.94). The 9-item rapid form captures diverse needs. A
two-factor structure was the most appropriate but fell short of adequate
fit (Khulna pilot: RMSEA=0.092, 90% CI 0.000 to 0.158, CFI=0.93,
TLI=0.89). Hypothesised associations between the MPNS scores and other
constructs were comparable between the MPNS-36 and MPNS-SF in all
populations, and replicated, with attenuation, in the MPNS-R. Internal
consistency remained acceptable.
Conclusions
The MPNS-SF offers a reliable and valid measure of adolescent girls’
menstrual hygiene experience while reducing participant burden, to
support implementation and improve measurement in menstrual health
research. The MPNS-R provides a brief measure with poorer structural
validity, suited to short surveys and including menstrual health within
broader research topics.
Funder
The Case for Her
National Health and Medical Research Council
Reckitt
Global Hygiene Institute
Reference40 articles.
1. Melendez-Torres G: measurement in the study of Menstrual
health and hygiene: A systematic review and audit;Hennegan;PLoS One,2020
2. Geertz A , Mazzola F , Peterson K , et al . An
opportunity to address Menstrual health and gender equity. in. Belgium.
2016. Available:
https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1847380/an-opportunity-to-address-menstrual-health-and-gender-equity/2593591/fragments/
on 22 Jun 2023. CID: 20.500.12592/7dwhn3
3. Measuring Menstrual hygiene experience: development and
validation of the Menstrual practice needs scale (MPNS-36) in Soroti,
Uganda;Hennegan;BMJ Open,2020
4. Caruso BA , Conrad A , Salinger A , et al .
Advancement of Metrics for Menstrual hygiene management in the
workplace: final report. in. Washington. DC, USA: USAID water,
sanitation, and hygiene partnerships and learning for Sustainability
(Washpals) project. 2021.
5. Menstrual practice needs scale (MPNS): Reliability and
validity of the Turkish version;Vural;Cyprus J Med Sci,2021