Efficacy and safety of a digital check-in and triage kiosk in emergency departments: a systematic review protocol

Author:

Sehgal Himani Laxshmi KaurORCID,Greenfield Geva,Neves Ana LuisaORCID,Harmon Mark,Majeed AzeemORCID,Hayhoe Benedict

Abstract

IntroductionIncreasing demand for healthcare services worldwide has led to unprecedented challenges in managing patient flow and delivering timely care in emergency care settings. Overcrowding, prolonged waiting times, reduced patient satisfaction and increased mortality are some of the consequences of this increased demand. To address this issue, some healthcare providers have turned to digital systems, such as self-check-in kiosks, for efficient patient triage and prioritisation. While digital triage systems hold promise for efficient patient prioritisation, reduced data duplication, shorter waiting times, improved patient satisfaction, the impact on workflow, the accuracy of triage and staff workload require further exploration for successful implementation in emergency care settings. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of digital check-in and triage kiosk implementation within emergency departments.Methods and analysisA systematic review will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct and will include quantitative and mixed method studies with a significant quantitative component, related to self-service kiosk implementation in emergency departments. The outcomes of interest will focus on the efficacy and safety of digital triage, including triage time, workflow, the diagnostic accuracy of triage and adverse events. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. A narrative synthesis will be used to summarise the findings of the included studies.Ethics and disseminationThis review is exempt from ethical approval because it will be analysing published studies containing non-identifiable data. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42024481506.

Funder

NIHR Clinical Research Network North West London

Publisher

BMJ

Reference24 articles.

1. Baird B , Charles A , Honeyman M , et al . Understanding pressures in general practice, 2016. Available: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/Understanding-GP-pressures-Kings-Fund-May-2016.pdf [Accessed 2 Nov 2023].

2. Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14

3. The epidemiology of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study

4. Utilization of an electronic triage system by emergency department nurses;Alumran;J Multidiscip Healthc,2020

5. The use of a self-check-in kiosk for early patient identification and queuing in the emergency department;Coyle;CJEM,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3