Integrating participants as partners in research governance and operations: an approach from theAll of UsResearch Program Engagement Core

Author:

Hammack-Aviran CatherineORCID,Fair Alecia Malin,Aldrich Melinda,Richmond Jennifer,Carpenter Selena McCoy,Watson Karriem S,Cohn Elizabeth G,Wilkins Consuelo HopkinsORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesDuring the last two decades, researchers and funders increasingly recognised the value of engaging patients and communities in research. Despite progress, community engagement remains challenging. There are few examples of successful participant engagement in governance of large-scale research programmes. Here we describe efforts to engage participants as partners in new governance roles in theAll of UsResearch Program, a precision medicine research initiative which intends to enrol at least one million participants. Using intentional, participant-centric engagement strategies, theAll of UsEngagement Core recruited and integrated a diverse group of participants into governance roles including Steering and Executive Committees. Evaluation measures included a survey to assess Consortium Members’ readiness for participant engagement.ResultsOver a 3-year period, all items on the survey increased (higher readiness). Of the 291 respondents to the 2021 survey, respondents most frequently agreed that participant perspectives are essential (100%), participants understand enough to contribute meaningfully (94%) and participants should be involved in setting goals (96%). Respondents least frequently agreed that participants should have an equal voice in Working Groups (75%), Steering Committee (69%) and Executive Committee (63%).ConclusionIn conclusion, participants can be effectively integrated into large-scale research governance, which is associated with increased researcher readiness for engagement.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

National Cancer Institute

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

West End Home Foundation

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

National Institute of Health

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Staley K . Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. National Institute for Health Research; 2009.

2. A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

3. Culture-centeredness in community-based participatory research: contributions to health education intervention research;Wallerstein;Health Education Research,2019

4. Wallerstein N , Oetzel J , Duran B , et al . What predicts outcomes in CBPR. In: Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes, 2. 2008: 371–92.

5. Hall KL , Vogel AL , Croyle RT . Engaging the community: community-based Participatory research and team Science . In: Strategies for team science success. Springer, 2019: 123–34. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3