Did the UK’s COVID-19 restrictions during 2020 have a differential impact on the well-being of the LGBQ+ population: a mixed methods study

Author:

Hope Vivian DORCID,Timpson HannahORCID,Porcellato LornaORCID,Brett Caroline EORCID,Harrison RebeccaORCID,Hunt AnnaORCID,Bigland CharlotteORCID,Leavey ConanORCID,Hay GordonORCID,Saini PoojaORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveThe social distancing measures governments implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have had substantial impacts. For some communities, these impacts will be disproportionate, with those communities experiencing inequalities, marginalisation or discrimination facing specific challenges. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer and allied (LGBQ+) communities experience a range of well-being inequalities that may have been impacted by the pandemic. The study aimed to assess the comparative impact of the UK’s response to COVID-19 on LGBQ+ communities.DesignA mixed-method explanatory sequential study of the general population using a cross-sectional online survey and semistructured interviews.SettingCommunity, North West of England.ParticipantsAdults aged 18 years and over; 1540 participated in the survey (192, 12%, LGBQ+) with 49 undergoing semistructured interviews (15 LGBQ+) during spring and summer of 2020.ResultsSurvey findings indicated that LGBQ+ people experienced similar positive and negative impacts to the rest of the population, but some negative impacts were more marked among the LGBQ+ community. LGBQ+ participants were more likely to disagree that ‘the government considered the impact on people like you’ when preparing guidance. They were significantly more likely to report being unable to access sufficient food and required medication, eating less healthily, exercising less regularly, experiencing poorer quality sleep and taking more pain medicine than usual. Interview data supported these differences; isolation, being unable to access social networks and concerns about health were commonly discussed by the LGBQ+ participants. Positive impacts, including better work–life balance, were similar across both groups.ConclusionsThe findings indicate LGBQ+ communities’ wellbeing inequalities have been compounded by the social distancing restrictions, for example, by impacts on social networks increasing loneliness. Preparedness planning for future pandemics should include equality impact assessments for potential interventions.

Funder

Liverpool John Moores University.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference47 articles.

1. World Health Organisation . “World health Organisation 'WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19'” Available: https://www.who.int/directorgeneral/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid19---11-march-2020 [Accessed 11 Mar 2020].

2. Prime Minister’s Office Prime Minister’s statement on Coronavirus (COVID-19): 23 March 2020'. UK goverment. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pmaddress-to-the-nation-on-coronavirus-23-march-2020 [Accessed 23 Mar 2020].

3. Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19;Lewnard;Lancet Infect Dis,2020

4. Public Health Interventions and SARS Spread, 2003

5. Public Health England . Guidance on social distancing for everyone in the UK. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-on-social-distancing-and-forvulnerable-people/guidance-on-social-distancing-for-everyone-in-the-uk-and-protecting-olderpeople-and-vulnerable-adults [Accessed 20 Mar 2020].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3