Abstract
ObjectiveThe social distancing measures governments implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have had substantial impacts. For some communities, these impacts will be disproportionate, with those communities experiencing inequalities, marginalisation or discrimination facing specific challenges. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer and allied (LGBQ+) communities experience a range of well-being inequalities that may have been impacted by the pandemic. The study aimed to assess the comparative impact of the UK’s response to COVID-19 on LGBQ+ communities.DesignA mixed-method explanatory sequential study of the general population using a cross-sectional online survey and semistructured interviews.SettingCommunity, North West of England.ParticipantsAdults aged 18 years and over; 1540 participated in the survey (192, 12%, LGBQ+) with 49 undergoing semistructured interviews (15 LGBQ+) during spring and summer of 2020.ResultsSurvey findings indicated that LGBQ+ people experienced similar positive and negative impacts to the rest of the population, but some negative impacts were more marked among the LGBQ+ community. LGBQ+ participants were more likely to disagree that ‘the government considered the impact on people like you’ when preparing guidance. They were significantly more likely to report being unable to access sufficient food and required medication, eating less healthily, exercising less regularly, experiencing poorer quality sleep and taking more pain medicine than usual. Interview data supported these differences; isolation, being unable to access social networks and concerns about health were commonly discussed by the LGBQ+ participants. Positive impacts, including better work–life balance, were similar across both groups.ConclusionsThe findings indicate LGBQ+ communities’ wellbeing inequalities have been compounded by the social distancing restrictions, for example, by impacts on social networks increasing loneliness. Preparedness planning for future pandemics should include equality impact assessments for potential interventions.
Funder
Liverpool John Moores University.
Reference47 articles.
1. World Health Organisation . “World health Organisation 'WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19'” Available: https://www.who.int/directorgeneral/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid19---11-march-2020 [Accessed 11 Mar 2020].
2. Prime Minister’s Office Prime Minister’s statement on Coronavirus (COVID-19): 23 March 2020'. UK goverment. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pmaddress-to-the-nation-on-coronavirus-23-march-2020 [Accessed 23 Mar 2020].
3. Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19;Lewnard;Lancet Infect Dis,2020
4. Public Health Interventions and SARS Spread, 2003
5. Public Health England . Guidance on social distancing for everyone in the UK. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-on-social-distancing-and-forvulnerable-people/guidance-on-social-distancing-for-everyone-in-the-uk-and-protecting-olderpeople-and-vulnerable-adults [Accessed 20 Mar 2020].