Clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes, including experiencing of patient safety events, associated with admitting patients to single rooms compared with shared accommodation for acute hospital admissions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Author:

Bertuzzi Andrea,Martin Alison,Clarke Nicola,Springate Cassandra,Ashton RachelORCID,Smith Wayne,Orlowski Andi,McPherson DuncanORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesAssess the impact of single rooms versus multioccupancy accommodation on inpatient healthcare outcomes and processes.DesignSystematic review and narrative synthesis.Data sourcesMedline, Embase, Google Scholar and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence website up to 17 February 2022.Eligibility criteriaEligible papers assessed the effect on inpatients staying in hospital of being assigned to a either a single room or shared accommodation, except where that assignment was for a direct clinical reason like preventing infection spread.Data extraction and synthesisData were extracted and synthesised narratively, according to the methods of Campbellet al.ResultsOf 4861 citations initially identified, 145 were judged to be relevant to this review. Five main method types were reported. All studies had methodological issues that potentially biased the results by not adjusting for confounding factors that are likely to have contributed to the outcomes. Ninety-two papers compared clinical outcomes for patients in single rooms versus shared accommodation. No clearly consistent conclusions could be drawn about overall benefits of single rooms. Single rooms were most likely to be associated with a small overall clinical benefit for the most severely ill patients, especially neonates in intensive care. Patients who preferred single rooms tended to do so for privacy and for reduced disturbances. By contrast, some groups were more likely to prefer shared accommodation to avoid loneliness. Greater costs associated with building single rooms were small and likely to be recouped over time by other efficiencies.ConclusionsThe lack of difference between inpatient accommodation types in a large number of studies suggests that there would be little effect on clinical outcomes, particularly in routine care. Patients in intensive care areas are most likely to benefit from single rooms. Most patients preferred single rooms for privacy and some preferred shared accommodation for avoiding loneliness.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022311689.

Funder

Department of Health and Social Care

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference156 articles.

1. Ewbank L , Thompson J , McKenna H , et al . Nhs Hospital bed numbers: past, present, future. The King’s Fund 2021. Available: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/nhs-hospital-bed-numbers

2. UK Government . Pm confirms £3.7 billion for 40 hospitals in biggest Hospital building programme in a generation. 2020. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-confirms-37-billion-for-40-hospitals-in-biggest-hospital-building-programme-in-a-generation

3. Single-Occupancy patient rooms: a systematic review of the literature since 2006;Taylor;HERD,2018

4. Pennington H , Isles C . Should hospitals provide all patients with single rooms? BMJ 2013;347:bmj.f5695. doi:10.1136/bmj.f5695

5. Trading company for privacy: a study of patients’ experiences;Roos;Nurs Ethics,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3