What do healthcare providers think of the quality of uterotonics? A mixed-methods systematic review

Author:

Torloni Maria ReginaORCID,Betran Ana PilarORCID,Vazquez Corona Martha,Bohren MeghanORCID,Widmer Mariana

Abstract

ObjectivesTo synthesise evidence on the perceptions of healthcare providers (HCPs) about the quality of oxytocin and misoprostol available in their settings, and their actions as a result of these perceptions.DesignMixed-methods systematic review.Eligibility criteriaWe included quantitative and qualitative studies reporting HCPs’ perceptions about oxytocin or misoprostol quality.Data sourcesWe searched CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ebscohost, Embase, PubMed, Global Index Medicus, Portal regional BVS, PsycNET, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to 31 March 2022 and grey literature.Risk of biasWe used the Center for Evidence-Based Management critical appraisal tool for surveys. For qualitative studies, we used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. We conducted separate quantitative and qualitative syntheses and integrated the evidence into a narrative synthesis (convergent segregated review design).ResultsWe included five (three quantitative and two qualitative) studies, of moderate or high quality, conducted in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In the three quantitative studies (N=7065 participants), 8.2–21.3% of HCPs had experienced problems due to known/suspected low-quality oxytocin and 3.3% due to low-quality misoprostol. In the two qualitative studies, perception of oxytocin quality varied. In quantitative studies, when confronted with suspected/known low-quality oxytocin, 29–78% of HCPs would inform a supervisor, 62% would document this in writing, 45–54% would change to another drug and 5–37% would double the dose of oxytocin. Qualitative evidence suggests that many HCPs do not formally report suspected low-quality oxytocin or misoprostol, and use higher doses or additional uterotonics.ConclusionsA proportion of HCPs from LMICs perceive oxytocin to be of low quality. There is very limited evidence on their perceptions about misoprostol. Many HCPs do not report suspected low-quality uterotonics but change to another medicine or double the dose of oxytocin.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022323812.

Funder

UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis

2. World Health Organization . WHO recommendations: Uterotonics for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.

3. Epidemiology of post-Partum haemorrhage;Deneux-Tharaux;J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris),2014

4. World Health Organization . WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. 2012. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/75411/9789241548502_eng.pdf;jsessionid=EF39B1ED12170CDBA858EA2DE40F9CBA?sequence=1

5. FIGO recommendations on the management of postpartum hemorrhage 2022;Escobar;Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3