How often are interventions in cluster-randomised controlled trials of complex interventions in general practices effective and reasons for potential shortcomings? Protocol and results of a feasibility project for a systematic review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How often are interventions in cluster-randomised controlled trials of complex interventions in general practices effective and reasons for potential shortcomings? Protocol and results of a feasibility project for a systematic review

Published:2016-02 Issue:2 Volume:6 Page:e009414
ISSN:2044-6055
Container-title:BMJ Open
language:en
Short-container-title:BMJ Open

Author:

Siebenhofer Andrea,Erckenbrecht Stefanie,Pregartner Gudrun,Berghold Andrea,Muth Christiane

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Sachverständigenrates zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen. Gutachten 2009 des Sachverständigenrates zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen. Koordination und Integration—Gesundheitsversorgung in einer Gesellschaft des längeren Lebens. 2009;16/13770:1–520.

2. Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care;Eldridge;Clin Trials,2004

3. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials;Campbell;BMJ,2004

4. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster;Campbell;BMJ,2012

5. The Ottawa Statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomised trials: précis for researchers and research ethics committees;Taljaard;BMJ,2013

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cluster-randomized controlled trials evaluating complex interventions in general practices are mostly ineffective: a systematic review;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2018-02

2. Applying quantitative bias analysis to estimate the plausible effects of selection bias in a cluster randomised controlled trial: secondary analysis of the Primary care Osteoarthritis Screening Trial (POST);Trials;2017-12