Assistive technology, information asymmetry and the role of brokerage services: a scoping review

Author:

D'Cunha Nathan MartinORCID,Isbel Stephen,Goss John,Pezzullo Lynne,Naumovski NenadORCID,Gibson Diane

Abstract

ObjectivesAccess to assistive technologies (ATs) is a human right for people with disabilities, but there are a range of barriers, including lack of adequate information. This review aimed to explore the implications of information asymmetry on the delivery of AT and to investigate if there are effective and equitable ways of providing AT brokerage services to people needing AT.DesignScoping review.Data sourcesEBSCO Medline, EBSCO Cinahl, Academic Search Ultimate, Business Source Ultimate, Proquest Central, Scopus, Web of Science, PsychINFO, EconLit and JSTOR were searched through 18 July 2021.Eligibility criteriaIntervention and observational studies and articles directly related to information asymmetry and brokerage in the context of AT were included. In addition, a scan of web-based resources and services was undertaken.Data extraction and synthesisFour authors independently screened the articles for inclusion and performed a narrative synthesis.ResultsThirty-three articles were identified. The narrative synthesis showed that: (1) AT users want access to impartial information sources; (2) users want to be involved in AT selection; (3) users benefit from access to demonstration sites; (4) users want access to training and ongoing support in their use of AT; and (5) users want access to information on new and emerging technologies. Access to information and user engagement, we produced better outcomes and satisfaction. Web-based repositories are valuable for user research and peer feedback, while demonstration sites address the need for expert advice, trial use of equipment, training and support in equipment use and maintenance.ConclusionsAccess to impartial information brokerage is critical to optimise AT selection. The implications of information asymmetry include lower user satisfaction, equipment underutilisation or abandonment. Aspects such as access to demonstration sites and web-based resources were also important.

Funder

Assistive Technology Australia

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. World Health Organization . “Assistive Technology”, 2018. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology

2. United Nations . “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.”, 2016. Available: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html

3. Beale R . “Australia Has Failed Its Older Disabled Citizens” (Submission to the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety by Roger Beale AO), 2021. Available: https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/system/files/2020-10/AWF.600.02422.0001.pdf

4. Translation of evidence-based assistive technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users' perceptions of the barriers and opportunities;Hughes;BMC Health Serv Res,2014

5. Assistive technology provision: towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology;de Witte;Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3