Use of the nominal group technique to identify stakeholder priorities and inform survey development: an example with informal caregivers of people with scleroderma

Author:

Rice Danielle B,Cañedo-Ayala Mara,Turner Kimberly A,Gumuchian Stephanie T,Malcarne Vanessa L,Hagedoorn Mariët,Thombs Brett D

Abstract

ObjectivesThe nominal group technique (NGT) allows stakeholders to directly generate items for needs assessment surveys. The objective was to demonstrate the use of NGT discussions to develop survey items on (1) challenges experienced by informal caregivers of people living with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and (2) preferences for support services.DesignThree NGT groups were conducted. In each group, participants generated lists of challenges and preferred formats for support services. Participants shared items, and a master list was compiled, then reviewed by participants to remove or merge overlapping items. Once a final list of items was generated, participants independently rated challenges on a scale from 1 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important) and support services on a scale from 1 (not at all likely to use) to 10 (very likely to use). Lists generated in the NGT discussions were subsequently reviewed and integrated into a single list by research team members.SettingSSc patient conferences held in the USA and Canada.ParticipantsInformal caregivers who previously or currently were providing care for a family member or friend with SSc.ResultsA total of six men and seven women participated in the NGT discussions. Mean age was 59.8 years (SD=12.6). Participants provided care for a partner (n=8), parent (n=1), child (n=2) or friend (n=2). A list of 61 unique challenges was generated with challenges related to gaps in information, resources and support needs identified most frequently. A list of 18 unique support services was generated; most involved online or in-person delivery of emotional support and educational material about SSc.ConclusionsThe NGT was an efficient method for obtaining survey items directly from SSc caregivers on important challenges and preferences for support services.

Funder

The Rare Disease Foundation and the BC Children’s Hospital Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. O’Haire C , McPheeters M , Nakamoto E , et al . Engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2011. Report No: 11-EHC044-EF.

2. STUDENT INTEREST IN TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE (SITS) SURVEY: DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION, AND USE OF A NEW INSTRUMENT

3. Reasons for non-participation in scleroderma support groups;Delisle;Clin Exp Rheumatol,2016

4. Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: a Delphi survey

5. Francis J , Eccles MP , Johnston M , et al . Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2004.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3