‘Just an extra pair of hands’? A qualitative study of obstetric service users’ and professionals’ views towards 24/7 consultant presence on a single UK tertiary maternity unit

Author:

Reid Holly EORCID,Wittkowski Anja,Vause Sarah,Heazell Alexander E P

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the views of maternity service users and professionals towards obstetric consultant presence 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.DesignSemistructured interviews conducted face to face with maternity service users and professionals in March and April 2016. All responses were analysed together (ie, both service users’ and professionals’ responses) using an inductive thematic analysis.SettingA large tertiary maternity unit in the North West of England that has implemented 24/7 obstetric consultant presence.ParticipantsAntenatal and postnatal inpatient service users (n=10), midwives, obstetrics and gynaecology specialty trainees and consultant obstetricians (n=10).ResultsFive themes were developed: (1) ‘Just an extra pair of hands?(the consultant’s role), (2)the context, (3)the team, (4)trainingand(5)change for the consultant. Respondents acknowledged that obstetrics is an acute specialty, and consultants resolve intrapartum complications. However, variability in consultant experience and behaviour altered perception of its impact. Service users were generally positive towards 24/7 consultant presence but were not aware that it was not standard practice across the UK. Professionals were more pragmatic and discussed how the implementation of 24/7 working had affected their work, development of trainees and potential impacts on future consultants.ConclusionsThe findings raised several issues that should be considered by practitioners and policymakers when making decisions about the implementation of 24/7 consultant presence in other maternity units, including attributes of the consultants, the needs of maternity units, the team hierarchy, trainee development, consultants’ other duties and consultant absences.

Funder

Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Charity

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women

2. Healthcare Commission. Towards better births: a review of maternity services in England. London: Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, 2008.

3. National Health Service Litigation Authority. Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts. Maternity. Clinical Risk Management Standards. London: National Health Service Litigation Authority, 2013.

4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.. The future role of the consultant: a working party report. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2005.

5. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Midwives, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Safer childbirth: minimum standards for the organisation and delivery of care in labour. London: RCOG Press, 2007.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3