Responsible exit of humanitarian aid agencies at the end of programmes: a scoping review protocol

Author:

Bahati DjokiORCID,Sy Houssynatou,Kalhor Aram,Marchal BrunoORCID

Abstract

IntroductionIn humanitarian settings, aid agencies are constantly challenged by difficult decisions such as when and how to terminate aid without harming the aid recipients, local institutions, staff members and the organisation. Despite important efforts devoted to responsibly leaving a setting, hurtful exits are still common in contemporary relief aid. Moreover, debates on how humanitarian aid agencies exit are limited, with no previous comprehensive evidence synthesis on the concept of ‘responsible exit’. The objective of this scoping review is to map evidence and knowledge gaps, to identify and describe concepts, theories and existing frameworks related to ‘responsible exit’ of humanitarian aid agencies.Methods and analysisOur search uses searches of several bibliographic databases (CAB Direct (including Global Health), Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar) as well as manual searches of specific journals and retrieval of grey literature through searches of organisational websites and direct contact with experts and organisations. Reference tracking will be used to identify additional sources. Searches will cover papers available up to the dates of the searches (December 2022 to January 2023), with no date restrictions applied to the literature search. To be included, published or unpublished papers must explicitly discuss the exit of humanitarian aid agencies from humanitarian settings and be accessible. We will exclude all exits related to military, local and governmental humanitarian operations, education, development, employment, and business sectors. Only papers written in English and French will be considered. Three reviewers will conduct the selection process against the predefined criteria. Data will be extracted in an iterative process following pre-established items and the results will be presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Extension for Scoping Reviews flow chart, tables and/or graphs, and descriptive formats.Ethics and disseminationBeing a review, conducted on publicly available information, no ethical approval is required. The results will be disseminated through publication in an open access journal, scientific conferences, workshops, and via humanitarian aid agencies to facilitate further research and possible practical translations of generated knowledge.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs . Global humanitarian overview 2022. New York: United Nations, 2021: 304. doi:10.18356/9789210012423

2. Ethical considerations for closing humanitarian projects: a scoping review;Pal;Int J Humanitarian Action,2019

3. Obrecht A , Swithern S , Doherty J . The state of the humanitarian system 2022 5th ed. London: ALNAP, 2022: 358.

4. Hill PS , Pavignani E , Michael M , et al . “The "empty void" is a crowded space: health service provision at the margins of fragile and conflict affected states”. Confl Health 2014;8:20. doi:10.1186/1752-1505-8-20

5. Brinkerhoff DW . From humanitarian and post-conflict assistance to health system strengthening in fragile states: clarifying the transition and the role of NGOs. Bethesda, 2008: 8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3