NEUROCANTRIAL: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a pain neuroscience education programme in adults with cancer pain

Author:

Ordoñez-Mora Leidy TatianaORCID,Rosero Ilem D,Morales-Osorio Marco Antonio,Guil Rocío,Quintero Jordan Giancarlo,Agudelo Jimenez Julian Alberto,Gonzalez-Ruiz Katherine,Avila-Valencia Juan Carlos

Abstract

IntroductionPain is the second most frequent symptom reported in patients with cancer among the main reasons for consultation. The incorporation of educational modalities in pain intervention processes has been suggested. This study aims to examine the efficacy of neuroscience pain education (PNE) in relation to pain, biopsychosocial variables and functional capacity in comparison with conventional treatment. It is hypothesised that an intervention based on PNE achieves better outcomes than conventional management, in terms of pain, biopsychosocial variables and functional capacity in adults with oncological pain.Methods and analysisThis will be a single-blind, controlled clinical trial in which two groups will be compared using changes in pain as the primary measure. The first group will receive conventional treatment in addition to PNE, and participants will undergo an intervention of nine sessions (one session per week, for a total of 9 weeks), each lasting 30–40 min. Specifically, these sessions will teach biophysiological elements using metaphors that allow the adoption of these concepts related to pain. The second group will receive conventional treatment (pharmacological treatment). For this study, a sample size calculation was made based on the background, where 80 adults with oncological pain were required. An initial evaluation will be made to establish the baseline characteristics, and then, according to the randomisation, the assignment to the PNE group or the control group will be made and the two groups will be summoned again. Ten weeks later, for the intervention evaluation, the statistical analysis plan will be established by protocol and by intention-to-treat.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol complies with all ethical considerations. The authors commit to presenting the study’s results. This study was approved by the ethics committees of the Universidad Santiago de Cali, Clínica de Occidente/Angiografía de Occidente. The authors commit to presenting the study’s results.Trial registration numberNCT05581784.

Funder

General Directorate of Research

Universidad Santiago de Cali

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) . Anuario Estadístico 2021. Bogotá, D. C. INC; 2022. Available: https://www.cancer.gov.co/recursos_user/files/libros/archivos/Anuario_Estadi%CC%81sticoINC_2021.pdf

2. Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines

3. Terminology [International Association for the Study of Pain]. Available: https://www.iasp-pain.org/resources/terminology/ [Accessed 22 May 2022].

4. Breast cancer EDGE task force outcomes: clinical measures of pain;Harrington;Rehabil Oncol,2014

5. Types and epidemiology of cancer-related neuropathic pain: the intersection of cancer pain and neuropathic pain;Lema;Oncologist,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3