Barriers and facilitators to use of digital health tools by healthcare practitioners and their patients, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multimethods study

Author:

Turnbull Sophie LouiseORCID,Dack Charlotte,Lei Jiedi,Aksu Irem,Grant Sabrina,Lasseter Gemma,Silarova BarboraORCID,Ainsworth Ben

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore how healthcare practitioners (HCPs) made decisions about the implementation of digital health technologies (DHTs) in their clinical practice before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignA multimethods study, comprising semistructured interviews conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, supplemented with an online survey that was conducted during the pandemic with a different sample, to ensure the qualitative findings remained relevant within the rapidly changing healthcare context. Participants were recruited through HCP networks, snowballing and social media. Data were analysed thematically.SettingPhone interviews and online survey.ParticipantsHCPs represented a range of professions from primary and secondary care across England, with varied socioeconomic deprivation.Results24 HCPs were interviewed, and 16 HCPs responded to the survey. In the interviews, HCPs described three levels where decisions were made, which determined who would have access to what DHTs: health organisation, HCP and patient levels. These decisions resulted in the unequal implementation of DHTs across health services, created barriers for HCPs using DHTs in their practice and influenced HCPs’ decisions on which patients to supply DHTs with. In the survey, HCPs described being provided support to overcome some of the barriers at the organisation and HCP level during the pandemic. However, they cited similar concerns to pre-pandemic about barriers patients faced using DHTs (eg, digital literacy). In the absence of centralised guidance on how to manage these barriers, health services made their own decisions about how to adapt their services for those who struggled with DHTs.ConclusionsDecision-making at the health organisation, HCP and patient levels influences inequalities in access to DHTs for HCPs and patients. The mobilisation of centralised information and resources during the pandemic can be viewed as good practice for reducing barriers to use of DHTs for HCPs. However, attention must also be paid to reducing barriers to accessing DHTs for patients.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit

GW4 Digital Crucible

Publisher

BMJ

Reference38 articles.

1. NHS . NHS long-term plan. 2019.

2. Acceptance and perception of artificial intelligence usability in eye care (appraise) for ophthalmologists: a multinational perspective;Gunasekeran;Front Med (Lausanne),2022

3. NICE . Evidence standards framework for digital health technologies, Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/corporate/ecd7

4. Digitalising diabetes support groups in response to the coronavirus COVID ‐19 outbreak: a collaborative initiative;Sauchelli;Practical Diabetes,2020

5. Exploring support needs of people living with diabetes during the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a UK survey;Sauchelli;BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3