Is the QCI framework suited for monitoring outcomes and costs in a teaching hospital using value-based healthcare principles? A retrospective cohort study

Author:

van Veghel WillemORCID,van Dijk Suzanne C,Klem Taco MAL,Weel Angelique E,Bügel Jean-Bart,Birnie Erwin

Abstract

ObjectivesThe objective is to develop a pragmatic framework, based on value-based healthcare principles, to monitor health outcomes per unit costs on an institutional level. Subsequently, we investigated the association between health outcomes and healthcare utilisation costs.DesignThis is a retrospective cohort study.SettingA teaching hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ParticipantsThe study was performed in two use cases. The bariatric population contained 856 patients of which 639 were diagnosed with morbid obesity body mass index (BMI) <45 and 217 were diagnosed with morbid obesity BMI ≥45. The breast cancer population contained 663 patients of which 455 received a lumpectomy and 208 a mastectomy.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe quality cost indicator (QCI) was the primary measures and was defined asQCI = (resulting outcome * 100)/average total costs (per thousand Euros)where average total costs entail all healthcare utilisation costs with regard to the treatment of the primary diagnosis and follow-up care. Resulting outcome is the number of patients achieving textbook outcome (passing all health outcome indicators) divided by the total number of patients included in the care path.ResultsThe breast cancer and bariatric population had the highest resulting outcome values in 2020 Q4, 0.93 and 0.73, respectively. The average total costs of the bariatric population remained stable (avg, €8833.55, min €8494.32, max €9164.26). The breast cancer population showed higher variance in costs (avg, €12 735.31 min €12 188.83, max €13 695.58). QCI values of both populations showed similar variance (0.3 and 0.8). Failing health outcome indicators was significantly related to higher hospital-based costs of care in both populations (p <0.01).ConclusionsThe QCI framework is effective for monitoring changes in average total costs and relevant health outcomes on an institutional level. Health outcomes are associated with hospital-based costs of care.

Publisher

BMJ

Reference30 articles.

1. OECD/European Union . Health at a Glance: Europe 2022: State of Health in the EU Cycle. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022.

2. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development . Healthcare Quality Indicators from 2011 to 2020. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2021. Available: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=51879

3. Social determinants of Multimorbidity patterns: a systematic review;Álvarez-Gálvez;Front Public Health,2023

4. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs

5. Neumann PJ , Ganiats TG , Russell LB , et al . Siegel: Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. 1st Edition. Oxford: Scholarship Online, 1996.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3