Women’s experiences of the Odon Device to assist vaginal birth and participation in intrapartum research: a qualitative study in a maternity unit in the Southwest of England

Author:

Hotton Emily JORCID,Blencowe Natalie SORCID,Lenguerrand Erik,Draycott Tim J,Crofts Joanna F,Wade JuliaORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate women’s experiences of having a birth assisted by the Odon Device (an innovative device for assisted vaginal birth) and participation in intrapartum research.DesignQualitative semistructured interviews and observations undertaken in the context of case study work embedded in the ASSIST feasibility study.SettingA tertiary referral National Health Service (NHS) maternity unit in the Southwest of England, between 8 October 2018 and 26 January 2019.ParticipantsEight women, four operators and 11 midwives participated with eight observations of the assisted vaginal birth, eight interviews with women in the postnatal period, 39 interviews/reflections with operators and 19 interviews with midwives. Women in the case study research were recruited from participants in the main ASSIST Study.InterventionThe Odon Device, an innovative device for assisted vaginal birth.ResultsThirty-nine case studies were undertaken. Triangulation of data sources (participant observation, interviews with women, operators and midwives) enabled the exploration of women’s experiences of the Odon Device and recruitment in the intrapartum trial. Experiences were overwhelmingly positive. Women were motivated to take part by a wish for a kinder birth, and because they perceived both the recruitment and research processes (including observation) to be highly acceptable, regardless of whether the Odon-assisted birth was successful or not.ConclusionsInterviews and observations from multiple stakeholders enabled insight into women’s experiences of an innovative device for assisted vaginal birth. Applying these qualitative methods more broadly may illuminate perspectives of key stakeholders in future intrapartum intervention research and beyond.Trial registration numberISRCTN10203171; ASSIST Study registration; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10203171.

Funder

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030

2. (UNIGME) UNIG for CME . Levels & trends in child mortality: report 2019, estimates developed by the United Nations inter-agency group for child mortality estimation [online], 2019. Available: https://www.unicef.org/reports/levels-and-trends-child-mortality-report-2020 [Accessed 11 Oct 2021].

3. WHO . Trends in maternal mortality: 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division [online], 2019. Available: https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017 [Accessed 11 Oct 2021].

4. WHO, UNICEF, AMDD, UNFPA . Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook [online], 2009. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/ 2009/9789241547734_eng.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed 11 Oct 2021].

5. Medico-legal considerations and operative vaginal delivery;Murphy;Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3