Using clinical cascades to measure health facilities’ obstetric emergency readiness: testing the cascade model using cross-sectional facility data in East Africa

Author:

Whaley BridgetORCID,Butrick ElizabethORCID,Sales Jessica MORCID,Wanyoro AnthonyORCID,Waiswa PeterORCID,Walker DilysORCID,Cranmer John NORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesGlobally, hundreds of women die daily from preventable pregnancy-related causes, with the greatest burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Five key emergencies—bleeding, infections, high blood pressure, delivery complications and unsafe abortions—account for nearly 75% of these obstetric deaths. Skilled clinicians with strategic supplies could prevent most deaths. In this study, we (1) measured facility readiness to manage common obstetric emergencies using the clinical cascades and signal function tracers; (2) compared these readiness estimates by facility characteristics; and (3) measured cascading drop-offs in resources.DesignA facility-based cross-sectional analysis of resources for common obstetric emergencies.SettingData were collected in 2016 from 23 hospitals (10 designated comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEmOC) facilities) in Migori County, western Kenya, and Busoga Region, eastern Uganda, in the Preterm Birth Initiative study in East Africa. Baseline data were used to estimate a facility’s readiness to manage common obstetric emergencies using signal function tracers and the clinical cascade model. We compared emergency readiness using the proportion of facilities with tracers (signal functions) and the proportion with resources for identifying and treating the emergency (cascade stages 1 and 2).ResultsThe signal functions overestimated practical emergency readiness by 23 percentage points across five emergencies. Only 42% of CEmOC-designated facilities could perform basic emergency obstetric care. Across the three stages of care (identify, treat and monitor-modify) for five emergencies, there was a 28% pooled mean drop-off in readiness. Across emergencies, the largest drop-off occurred in the treatment stage. Patterns of drop-off remained largely consistent across facility characteristics.ConclusionsAccurate measurement of obstetric emergency readiness is a prerequisite for strengthening facilities’ capacity to manage common emergencies. The cascades offer stepwise, emergency-specific readiness estimates designed to guide targeted maternal survival policies and programmes.Trial registration numberNCT03112018.

Funder

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. World Health Organization . Maternal mortality, 2019. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality [Accessed 21 Mar 2021].

2. World Health Organization . Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by who, UNICEF, UNFPA, world bank group, and the United nations population division. Geneva: Wrold Health Organization, 2019.

3. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis;Say;Lancet Glob Health,2014

4. World Health Organization . Mother-baby package: implementing safe motherhood in countries. Geneva, Switzerland: Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme, Division of Family Health, 1996.

5. World Health Organization . Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a Handbook. Geneva, Switzerland: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, 2009.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3