Abstract
ObjectivesTo assess the physical strains of employees in the German offshore wind industry, according to job type and phase of the wind farm (under construction or operation).DesignWeb-based cross-sectional survey.SettingOffshore wind farm companies operating within the German exclusive economic zone.ParticipantsMale workers with regular offshore commitments and at least 28 days spent offshore in the past year (n=268).Outcome measuresPhysical strains (eg, climbing, noise, working overhead, with twisted upper body or in confined spaces, vibration, heavy lifting, humidity, odours).ResultsThe most frequently mentioned physical strain was ’climbing’ with 63.8% of the respondents reporting to be always or frequently confronted with climbing and ascending stairs during offshore work. Work as a technician was associated with a greater exposition to noise, vibrations, humidity, cold, heat, chemical substances, lifting/carrying heavy loads, transport of equipment, working in non-ergonomic positions and in cramped spaces, as well as climbing.Indeed, statistical analyses showed that, after adjusting for phase of the wind farm, age, nationality, offshore experience, work schedule and type of shift, compared with non-technicians, working as a technician was associated with more frequently lifting/carrying of heavy loads (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.23), transport of equipment (OR 2.06 95% CI 1.27 to 3.33), working with a twisted upper body (OR 2.85 95% CI 1.74 to 4.69), working overhead (OR 2.77 95% CI 1.67 to 4.58) and climbing (OR 2.30 95% CI 1.40 to 3.77). Working in wind farms under construction was strongly associated with increased and decreased exposure to humidity (OR 2.32 95% CI 1.38 to 3.92) and poor air quality (OR 0.58 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95), respectively.ConclusionsWorkers on offshore wind farms constitute a heterogeneous group, including a wide variety of occupations. The degree of exposure to detrimental physical strains varies depending on the type of job. Technicians are more exposed to ergonomic challenges than other offshore workers.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Reference27 articles.
1. Nixon N . Timeline: The history of wind power. The Guardian, October 17th 2008. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/oct/17/wind-power-renewable-energy (accessed 30 Sep 2017).
2. Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology (IWES). Wind Monitor – Development in Germany. Kassel: IWES, 2016. http://windmonitor.iwes.fraunhofer.de/windmonitor_en/4_Offshore/1_zubau/2_entwicklung_in_deutschland/index.html. (accessed 30 Sep 2017).
3. Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC). Global Wind Report 2016 – Annual market update. Brussels: GWEC,, 2016. http://files.gwec.net/register?file=/files/GWR2016.pdf. (accessed 30 Sep 2017).
4. Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology (IWES). Wind Monitor – Turbines Size. Kassel: IWES, 2016. http://windmonitor.iwes.fraunhofer.de/windmonitor_en/4_Offshore/2_technik/3_Anlagengroesse/. (accessed 30 Sep 2017).
5. Stiftung Offshore Windenergie. Offshore Wind Energie – sauberer Strom aus dem Meer [Offshore wind energy - clean energy from the sea. Varel: Stiftung Offshore Windenergie, 2016. http://www.offshore-stiftung.de/offshore-windenergie. (accessed 30 Sep 2017).