Author:
Van Grootven Bastiaan,McNicoll Lynn,Mendelson Daniel A,Friedman Susan M,Fagard Katleen,Milisen Koen,Flamaing Johan,Deschodt Mieke
Abstract
ObjectiveTo find consensus on appropriate and feasible structure, process and outcome indicators for the evaluation of in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes.DesignAn international two-round Delphi study based on a systematic literature review (searching databases, reference lists, prospective citations and trial registers).SettingWestern Europe and the USA.ParticipantsThirty-three people with at least 2 years of clinical experience in geriatric co-management were recruited. Twenty-eight experts (16 from the USA and 12 from Europe) participated in both Delphi rounds (85% response rate).MeasuresParticipants rated the indicators on a nine-point scale for their (1) appropriateness and (2) feasibility to use the indicator for the evaluation of geriatric co-management programmes. Indicators were considered appropriate and feasible based on a median score of seven or higher. Consensus was based on the level of agreement using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.ResultsIn the first round containing 37 indicators, there was consensus on 14 indicators. In the second round containing 44 indicators, there was consensus on 31 indicators (structure=8, process=7, outcome=16). Experts indicated that co-management should start within 24 hours of hospital admission using defined criteria for selecting appropriate patients. Programmes should focus on the prevention and management of geriatric syndromes and complications. Key areas for comprehensive geriatric assessment included cognition/delirium, functionality/mobility, falls, pain, medication and pressure ulcers. Key outcomes for evaluating the programme included length of stay, time to surgery and the incidence of complications.ConclusionThe indicators can be used to assess the performance of geriatric co-management programmes and identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the indicators can be used to monitor the implementation and effect of these programmes.
Funder
KU Leuven Research Council
Reference69 articles.
1. Deschodt M , Claes V , Van Grootven B , et al . Comprehensive geriatric care in hospitals: the role of inpatient geriatric consultation teams. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), 2015.
2. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital;Ellis;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2011
3. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
4. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients
5. Effectiveness of in-hospital geriatric co-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Van Grootven;Age Ageing,2017
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献