Unequal uptake of skilled maternal health care services in Ethiopia: cross-sectional data analyses informed by the intersectionality theory

Author:

Shibre GebretsadikORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate intersectional inequality encompassing socioeconomic, geographical and demographic variables in the use of competent birth and postnatal care services in Ethiopia.DesignData for the study came from a series of the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys. Four major surveys were taken place between 2000 and 2016 and all were included in the study. 9867, 9075, 10 592 and 9915 live births born 5 years preceding the surveys that were attended by skilled health workers in 2000, 2005, 2011 and 2016, respectively, were included in the study. For the postnatal care, only the 2016 survey was used due to sample size issues in the other surveys, and 3843 women having live births 2 years preceding the survey had complete data, allowing for fitting of a model. Since the outcome measures are binary, the logit model was used. Intersectionality was analysed by entering interactions into models.SettingsPopulation-based representative surveys encompassing all areas of Ethiopia.ParticipantsThe study subjects are women of reproductive age who had live births 2 years preceding the 2016 survey (for postnatal care) and live births born 5 years preceding the respective surveys (for birth care).Outcome measuresThe outcome measures are skilled birth and postnatal care services. The postnatal care was for mothers within the first 2 days of giving birth and did not include care for the newborn. Competent maternal health care services are those that are provided by competent health workers: doctors, nurses, midwives and health officers.ResultsIt was observed that women at the crossroads of multiple axes of advantage and disadvantage had better and worse utilisation, respectively. For example, maternal education and residence intersected and predicted coverage of birth care was the highest among secondary schooling women who dwelt in urban settings with the values of 0.255; 95% CI 0.113 to 0.397 in 2000 and 0.589; 95% CI 0.359 to 0.819 in 2016 but was the lowest among non-educated women who lived in rural areas with the values of 0.0236; 95% CI 0.0154 to 0.0317 in 2000 and 0.203; 95% CI 0.177 to 0.229 in 2016.ConclusionsIt appeared that some women who were at the intersections of multiple axes of disadvantage had the lowest predicted coverage for maternal health care services. The study suggests that targeted interventions be developed for women who are at the intersection of multiple axes of marginalisation and that multiple sectors work in their sphere of resposibility to tackle social determinants of maternity care inequality. Policymakers may consider using intersectionality to inform development of targeted policies and or strategies. Further, future studies include structural drivers in the analysis of intersectionality to gain a better insight into the causes of disparities.

Funder

Addis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences

Publisher

BMJ

Reference69 articles.

1. UNICEF data: monitoring the situation of children and women. Delivery care. Each year, millions of births still occur without any assistance from a skilled attendant despite recent progress, Available: https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/delivery-care/#:~:text=Disparities%20in%20coverage&text=Globally%2C%20in%202021%2C%20approximately%2073,also%20observed%20across%20wealth%20quintiles

2. Women empowerment and skilled birth attendance in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis;Dickson;PLOS One,2021

3. Horizontal inequity in the utilization of maternal and reproductive health services: evidence from the 2018 Nigeria demographic and health survey;Aregbeshola;Front Health Serv,2022

4. Inequalities in the coverage of place of delivery and skilled birth attendance: analyses of cross-sectional surveys in 80 low and middle-income countries;Joseph;Reprod Health,2016

5. Inequalities in access and utilization of maternal, newborn and child health services in sub-Saharan Africa: a special focus on urban settings;Sidze;Matern Child Health J,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3