Abstract
ObjectiveChronic non-malignant diseases (CNMDs) are under-represented in specialist palliative home care (SPHC). The timely integration of SPHC for patients suffering from these diseases can reduce hospitalisation and alleviate symptom burdens. An intervention of an SPHC nurse–patient consultation followed by an interprofessional telephone case conference with the general practitioner (GP) was tested in the KOPAL trial (‘Concept for strengthening interprofessional collaboration for patients with palliative care needs’). As part of the trial, the aim of this study was to gain in-depth insights into SPHC physicians’ perspective on care with and without the KOPAL intervention for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia (D).DesignQualitative evaluation of the KOPAL intervention from the perspective of SPHC physicians as part of the KOPAL trial. Thematic-focused narrative interviews analysed with grounded theory.SettingWe conducted the KOPAL study and its qualitative evaluation in Lower Saxony and the greater Hamburg area, Germany.Participants11 physicians from 14 SPHC teams who participated in the trial were interviewed.ResultsA grounded theory of the necessity of collaboration between GPs and SPHC teams for patients with CHF, COPD and dementia was developed. From the perspective of SPHC physicians, patients with CNMD are generally difficult to manage in GP care. The timing of SPHC initiation is patient-specific, underscoring the need for collaboration between SPHC physicians and GPs. However, the primary mandate for healthcare should remain with GPs. SPHC physicians actively seek collaboration with GPs (eg, through the KOPAL intervention), viewing themselves as advisors for GPs and aspiring to collaborate as equal partners.ConclusionEffective communication and the negotiation of future interprofessional collaboration are essential for SPHC teams.Trial registration numberDRKS00017795.