Pain and other complications of pelvic mesh: a systematic review of qualitative studies and thematic synthesis of women’s accounts

Author:

Williams Amanda C de CORCID,Lodato Mary,McGrigor Honor

Abstract

ObjectivesSynthesis of the experience of women with pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal, to identify pain-related problems and to formulate psychological aspects of pain.DesignSystematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative studies of pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh, or mesh removal, in women over 18 years, using individual interviews, focus groups, free text, or written or oral contributions to formal enquiries.Data sourcesMedline, Embase and PsycINFO, from inception to 26 April 2023.Eligibility criteriaQualitative studies of pain and other symptoms from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal; adults; no language restriction.Data extraction and synthesisLine-by-line coding of participant quotations and study author statements by one author to provide codes that were applied to half the studies by another author and differences resolved by discussion. Codes were grouped into subthemes and themes by both authors, then scrutinised and discussed by a focus group of mesh-injured women for omissions, emphasis and coherence. Studies were appraised using an amalgamation of the CASP and COREQ tools.Results2292 search results produced 9 eligible studies, with 7–752 participants, a total of around 2000. Four recruited patients, four totally or partially from mesh advocacy groups, and two were national enquiries (UK and Australia). Four major themes were as follows: broken body, broken mind; distrust of doctors and the medical industry; broken life and keeping going—a changed future. Psychological content mainly concerned the loss of trust in medical care, leaving women unsupported in facing an uncertain future. Mesh-injured women strongly endorsed the findings.ConclusionsPain and other problems associated with pelvic mesh are profound and far-reaching for women affected. Worse, they feel subject to continued gaslighting, including denial of their mesh-related problems and dismissal of their concerns about continued mesh insertion.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022330527.

Funder

Astra Zeneca

Medical Research Foundation

ESRC

MRC

BBSRC,

EliLilly

Versus Arthritis

Publisher

BMJ

Reference47 articles.

1. Trials of Transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ Prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process;Heneghan;BMJ Open,2017

2. Insertion and removal of vaginal mesh for pelvic organ Prolapse;M. Muffly;Clin Obstet Gynecol,2010

3. Surgery for women with pelvic organ Prolapse with or without stress urinary Incontinence;Baessler;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018

4. Laparoscopic Colposuspension for urinary Incontinence in women;Freites;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2019

5. Evaluation of guidelines on the use of vaginal mesh implants for pelvic organ Prolapse using the AGREE II instrument;Tsiapakidou;Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3