Abstract
ObjectivesThis study aimed at describing the use of a prospective database on hospital deliveries for analysing caesarean section (CS) practices according to the WHO manual for Robson classification, and for developing recommendations for improving the quality of care (QoC).DesignObservational study.SettingUniversity Obstetric Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women, the largest maternity unit in Sri Lanka.Data collection and analysisFor each childbirth, 150 variables were routinely collected in a standardised form and entered into a database. Data were routinely monitored for ensuring quality. Information on deliveries occurring from July 2015 to June 2017 were analysed according the WHO Robson classification manual. Findings were discussed internally to develop quality improvement recommendations.Results7504 women delivered in the hospital during the study period and at least one maternal or fetal pathological condition was reported in 2845 (37.9%). The CS rate was 30.0%, with 11.9% CS being performed prelabour. According to the Robson classification, Group 3 and Group 1 were the most represented groups (27.0% and 23.1% of population, respectively). The major contributors to the CS rate were group 5 (29.6%), group 1 (14.0%), group 2a (13.3%) and group 10 (11.5%). The most commonly reported indications for CS included abnormal cardiotocography/suspected fetal distress, past CS and failed progress of labour or failed induction. These suggested the need for further discussion on CS practices. Overall, 18 recommendations were agreed on. Besides updating protocols and hands-on training, activities agreed on included monitoring and supervision, criterion-based audits, risk management meetings and appropriate information for patients, and recommendations to further improve the quality of data.ConclusionsThis study provides an example on how the WHO manual for Robson classification can be used in an action-oriented manner for developing recommendations for improving the QoC, and the quality of data collected.
Funder
The implementation of the database was funded for the first year by a grant from the GREAT Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto.
Reference50 articles.
1. World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva. 2015 http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/161442/1/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf (accessed 16 October 2018).
2. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections
3. Classification of caesarean sections;Robson;Fetal Matern Med Rev,2001
4. World Health Organization. Robson Classification: Implementation Manual, Geneva. 2017 http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/robson-classification/en/ (accessed 16 Oct 2018).
5. The rising trend in caesarean section rates: should we and can we reduce it?;Goonewardene;Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,2012
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献