Author:
Erkelens Daphne CA,Wouters Loes TCM,Zwart Dorien LM,Damoiseaux Roger AMJ,De Groot Esther,Hoes Arno W,Rutten Frans H
Abstract
IntroductionIn the Netherlands, the ‘Netherlands Triage Standard’ (NTS) is frequently used as digital decision support system for telephone triage at out-of-hours services in primary care (OHS-PC). The aim of the NTS is to guarantee accessible, efficient and safe care. However, there are indications that current triage is inefficient, with overestimation of urgency, notably in suspected acute cardiovascular disease. In addition, in primary care settings the NTS has only been validated against surrogate markers, and diagnostic accuracy with clinical outcomes as the reference is unknown. In the Safety First study, we address this gap in knowledge by describing, understanding and improving the diagnostic process and urgency allocation in callers with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiovascular disease, in order to improve both efficiency and safety of telephone triage in this domain.Methods and analysisAn observational study in which 3000 telephone triage recordings (period 2014–2016) will be analysed. Information is collected from the recordings including caller and symptom characteristics and urgency allocation. The callers’ own general practitioners are contacted for the final diagnosis of each contact. We included recordings of callers with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke. With univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses the diagnostic accuracy of caller and symptom characteristics will be analysed in terms of predictive values with urgency level, and ACS and TIA/stroke as outcomes, respectively. To further improve our understanding of the triage process at OHS-PC, we will carry out additional studies applying both quantitative and qualitative methods: (i) case-control study on serious adverse events (SAE), (ii) conversation analysis study and (iii) interview study with triage nurses.Ethics and disseminationThe Medical Ethics Committee Utrecht, the Netherlands endorsed this study (National Trial Register identification: NTR7331). Results will be disseminated at scientific conferences, regional educational sessions and publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Reference49 articles.
1. Five-level emergency triage systems: variation in assessment of validity
2. Netherlands Triage Standard. http://de-nts.nl/ (cited 22 Jun 2018).
3. National guidelines for telephone triage and advice in Family Practice. https://www.nhg.org/winkel/producten/nhg-triagewijzer-versie-2016 (cited 22 Jun 2018).
4. The development and performance of after-hours primary care in the netherlands: a narrative review;Smits;Ann Intern Med,2017
5. Validity of telephone and physical triage in emergency care: The Netherlands Triage System
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献