Multicomponent processes to identify and prioritise low-value care in hospital settings: a scoping review

Author:

Tyack ZephanieORCID,Carter HannahORCID,Allen Michelle,Senanayake SameeraORCID,Warhurst Kym,Naicker Sundresan,Abell Bridget,McPhail Steven M

Abstract

ObjectivesThis scoping review mapped and synthesised original research that identified low-value care in hospital settings as part of multicomponent processes.DesignScoping review.Data sourcesElectronic databases (EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL) and grey literature were last searched 11 July and 3 June 2022, respectively, with no language or date restrictions.Eligibility criteriaWe included original research targeting the identification and prioritisation of low-value care as part of a multicomponent process in hospital settings.Data extraction and synthesisScreening was conducted in duplicate. Data were extracted by one of six authors and checked by another author. A framework synthesis was conducted using seven areas of focus for the review and an overuse framework.ResultsTwenty-seven records were included (21 original studies, 4 abstracts and 2 reviews), originating from high-income countries. Benefit or value (11 records), risk or harm (10 records) were common concepts referred to in records that explicitly defined low-value care (25 records). Evidence of contextualisation including barriers and enablers of low-value care identification processes were identified (25 records). Common components of these processes included initial consensus, consultation, ranking exercise or list development (16 records), and reviews of evidence (16 records). Two records involved engagement of patients and three evaluated the outcomes of multicomponent processes. Five records referenced a theory, model or framework.ConclusionsGaps identified included applying systematic efforts to contextualise the identification of low-value care, involving people with lived experience of hospital care and initiatives in resource poor contexts. Insights were obtained regarding the theories, models and frameworks used to guide initiatives and ways in which the concept ‘low-value care’ had been used and reported. A priority for further research is evaluating the effect of initiatives that identify low-value care using contextualisation as part of multicomponent processes.

Funder

Medical Research Future Fund

Publisher

BMJ

Reference76 articles.

1. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world

2. Committee on the Learning Health Care System, Institute of Medicine . Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2013.

3. In search of professional consensus in defining and reducing low-value care;Scott;Med J Aust,2015

4. Identifying low-value care: the Royal Australasian College of Physicians' EVOLVE initiative;Soon;Med J Aust,2016

5. Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review;Augustsson;Implement Sci Commun,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3