Improving Peer Online Forums (iPOF): protocol for a realist evaluation of peer online mental health forums to inform practice and policy

Author:

Lobban Fiona,Coole Matthew,Donaldson Emma,Glossop ZoeORCID,Haines Jade,Johnston Rose,Jones Steven H,Lodge Christopher,Machin Karen,Marshall Paul,Meacock Rachel,Penhaligon Kate,Rakić Tamara,Rawsthorne Mat,Rayson Paul,Robinson HeatherORCID,Rycroft-Malone Jo,Semino ElenaORCID,Shryane Nick,Wise Sara

Abstract

IntroductionPeer online mental health forums are commonly used and offer accessible support. Positive and negative impacts have been reported by forum members and moderators, but it is unclear why these impacts occur, for whom and in which forums. This multiple method realist study explores underlying mechanisms to understand how forums work for different people. The findings will inform codesign of best practice guidance and policy tools to enhance the uptake and effectiveness of peer online mental health forums.Methods and analysisIn workstream 1, we will conduct a realist synthesis, based on existing literature and interviews with approximately 20 stakeholders, to generate initial programme theories about the impacts of forums on members and moderators and mechanisms driving these. Initial theories that are relevant for forum design and implementation will be prioritised for testing in workstream 2.Workstream 2 is a multiple case study design with mixed methods with several online mental health forums differing in contextual features. Quantitative surveys of forum members, qualitative interviews and Corpus-based Discourse Analysis and Natural Language Processing of forum posts will be used to test and refine programme theories. Final programme theories will be developed through novel triangulation of the data.Workstream 3 will run alongside workstreams 1 and 2. Key stakeholders from participating forums, including members and moderators, will be recruited to a Codesign group. They will inform the study design and materials, refine and prioritise theories, and codesign best policy and practice guidance.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was granted by Solihull Research Ethics Committee (IRAS 314029). Findings will be reported in accordance with RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) guidelines, published as open access and shared widely, along with codesigned tools.Trial registration numberISRCTN 62469166; the protocol for the realist synthesis in workstream one is prospectively registered at PROSPERO CRD42022352528.

Funder

NIHR

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. McManus S , Bebbington PE , Jenkins R , et al . Mental health and wellbeing in England: the adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2014. NHS digital, 2016.

2. NHS Confederation . Digital inclusion in mental health - a guide to help increase choice and improve access to digital mental health services; 2020.

3. Children and parents: media use and attitudes report 2019. London, UK Ofcom; 2020.

4. Saha K , Sharma A , eds. Causal factors of effective psychosocial outcomes in online mental health communities. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media. 2020.

5. A systematic review exploring how young people use online forums for support around mental health issues;Hanley;J Ment Health,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3