Abstract
IntroductionVaccine coverage remains inequitable globally. Many systematic reviews have looked at the effectiveness of strategies to improve vaccine uptake; however, these reviews frequently lack data from low and middle-income countries (LMICs), where evidence of cost-effective strategies is most valuable. This is partly because reviews often exclude non-randomised, observational or unpublished evaluations that are common in LMICs. Many reviews also exclude multicomponent interventions due to challenges isolating the effect of each component. A comprehensive mapping of multicomponent interventions implemented in LMICs would increase the visibility of studies excluded from systematic reviews and improve comparability of future evaluations by providing guidance for researchers on evaluation frameworks. This scoping review aims to identify, compare and summarise the properties and evaluation methods of multicomponent interventions to improve uptake of routine childhood vaccines in LMICs, and to assess the strengths and limitations of evaluation frameworks applied.Methods and analysisThis review will be conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We will search the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Eldis and Global Health (CAB Direct), Global Index Medicus, 3ie Portal, Google Scholar, COnnecting REpositories, and reference lists. One author will screen titles and abstracts and extract data from included articles using a pretested data extraction template. Uncertainties will be resolved through discussion with another author. Only studies published in English will be included for full review. We will assess the practicability, applicability, sensitivity and specificity of the evaluation frameworks used and present results using descriptive statistics, summary tables and charts.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required. The review will be submitted as part of a doctoral thesis, presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.Study registrationhttps://osf.io/7r84g.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Australian Government
Reference39 articles.
1. Immunization: vital progress, unfinished agenda
2. Rodrigues CMC , Plotkin SA . Impact of vaccines; health, economic and social perspectives. Front Microbiol 2020;11:1526. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01526
3. World Health Organization . Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy To Leave No One Behind. Geneva, 2020.
4. World Health Organization . COVID-19 pandemic fuels largest continued backslide in vaccinations in three decades, 2022. Available: https://www.who.int/news/item/15-07-2022-covid-19-pandemic-fuels-largest-continued-backslide-in-vaccinations-in-three-decades [Accessed 29 Sep 2022].
5. Ning C , Wang H , Wu J , et al . The COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine inequity worldwide: an empirical study based on global data. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:5267. doi:10.3390/ijerph19095267