Abstract
ObjectivesRegulatory oversight organisations play an important role in quality stewardship in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Performance indicators are a key tool for any quality-related work. Our aim was to better understand how and what performance indicators are used by regulatory oversight organisations for long-term care facilities oversight and which features are affecting their fitness for use.DesignQualitative descriptive.Setting and participantsWe explored the use of LTC facility performance indicators by 10 regulatory oversight organisations from England, Ireland, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Scotland, Singapore, Slovenia, Sweden and the Netherlands. We collected information by means of a questionnaire, 13 follow-up interviews with 20 experts from these organisations and document review.ResultsPerformance indicators are used by participating oversight organisations to choose priority topics for audits, prioritise facilities to be audited and to identify areas within an audited facility, that require more attention. The indicators of most interest to oversight organisations are related to the dimensions of care articulated in the preset requirements on which audits are based. When the purpose of using indicators is to design a risk assessment model, the fitness for use of indicators ultimately depends on their ability to predict non-compliances on subsequent audits. When indicators are used directly by auditors, the ease of access, clear guidance to evaluate the data and the provision of contextual information are used by oversight organisations to increase fitness for use.ConclusionsOversight organisations do not use LTC facility performance indicators to assess quality, but rather to assess the risk of lower quality or of non-compliance with requirements. This risk-related purpose has to be considered when the indicators used in oversight are chosen and when other aspects of fitness for use, such as data analysis and displaying findings, are developed.
Funder
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network
Reference38 articles.
1. Mor V , Leone T , Maresso A . Regulating long-term care quality. Cambdridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 3–28. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107323711
2. Schweppenstedde D , Hinrichs S , Ogbu U , et al . Regulating quality and safety of health and social care: international experiences. Rand Health Q 2014;4:1.
3. Mot E , Faber R , Geerts J , et al . Performance of long-term care systems in europe. ENEPRI Research Report no.117. Brussels Centre for European Policy Studies; 2012.
4. Sutherland K , Leatherman S . Regulation and quality improvement. A review of the evidence london: the health foundation. 2006.
5. Walshe K . Regulating healthcare: a prescription for improvement. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2003.