How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries

Author:

Poldrugovac MirchaORCID,Pot Anne Margriet,Klazinga Niek,Kringos Dionne

Abstract

ObjectivesRegulatory oversight organisations play an important role in quality stewardship in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Performance indicators are a key tool for any quality-related work. Our aim was to better understand how and what performance indicators are used by regulatory oversight organisations for long-term care facilities oversight and which features are affecting their fitness for use.DesignQualitative descriptive.Setting and participantsWe explored the use of LTC facility performance indicators by 10 regulatory oversight organisations from England, Ireland, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Scotland, Singapore, Slovenia, Sweden and the Netherlands. We collected information by means of a questionnaire, 13 follow-up interviews with 20 experts from these organisations and document review.ResultsPerformance indicators are used by participating oversight organisations to choose priority topics for audits, prioritise facilities to be audited and to identify areas within an audited facility, that require more attention. The indicators of most interest to oversight organisations are related to the dimensions of care articulated in the preset requirements on which audits are based. When the purpose of using indicators is to design a risk assessment model, the fitness for use of indicators ultimately depends on their ability to predict non-compliances on subsequent audits. When indicators are used directly by auditors, the ease of access, clear guidance to evaluate the data and the provision of contextual information are used by oversight organisations to increase fitness for use.ConclusionsOversight organisations do not use LTC facility performance indicators to assess quality, but rather to assess the risk of lower quality or of non-compliance with requirements. This risk-related purpose has to be considered when the indicators used in oversight are chosen and when other aspects of fitness for use, such as data analysis and displaying findings, are developed.

Funder

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Mor V , Leone T , Maresso A . Regulating long-term care quality. Cambdridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 3–28. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107323711

2. Schweppenstedde D , Hinrichs S , Ogbu U , et al . Regulating quality and safety of health and social care: international experiences. Rand Health Q 2014;4:1.

3. Mot E , Faber R , Geerts J , et al . Performance of long-term care systems in europe. ENEPRI Research Report no.117. Brussels Centre for European Policy Studies; 2012.

4. Sutherland K , Leatherman S . Regulation and quality improvement. A review of the evidence london: the health foundation. 2006.

5. Walshe K . Regulating healthcare: a prescription for improvement. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2003.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3