Defining measures of emergency care access in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Author:

Hirner Sarah,Dhakal Jyotshila,Broccoli Morgan Carol,Ross Madeline,Calvello Hynes Emilie J,Bills Corey BORCID

Abstract

BackgroundOver 50% of annual deaths in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) could be averted through access to high-quality emergency care.ObjectivesWe performed a scoping review of the literature that described at least one measure of emergency care access in LMICs in order to understand relevant barriers to emergency care systems.Eligibility criteriaEnglish language studies published between 1 January 1990 and 30 December 2020, with one or more discrete measure(s) of access to emergency health services in LMICs described.Source of evidencePubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the grey literature.Charting methodsA structured data extraction tool was used to identify and classify the number of ‘unique’ measures, and the number of times each unique measure was studied in the literature (‘total’ measures). Measures of access were categorised by access type, defined by Thomas and Penchansky, with further categorisation according to the ‘Three Delay’ model of seeking, reaching and receiving care, and the WHO’s Emergency Care Systems Framework (ECSF).ResultsA total of 3103 articles were screened. 75 met full study inclusion. Articles were uniformly descriptive (n=75, 100%). 137 discrete measures of access were reported. Unique measures of accommodation (n=42, 30.7%) and availability (n=40, 29.2%) were most common. Measures of seeking, reaching and receiving care were 22 (16.0%), 46 (33.6%) and 69 (50.4%), respectively. According to the ECSF slightly more measures focused on prehospital care—inclusive of care at the scene and through transport to a facility (n=76, 55.4%) as compared with facility-based care (n=57, 41.6%).ConclusionsNumerous measures of emergency care access are described in the literature, but many measures are overaddressed. Development of a core set of access measures with associated minimum standards are necessary to aid in ensuring universal access to high-quality emergency care in all settings.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. The quality-of-care agenda in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings;Neilson;Bull World Health Organ,2021

2. Accelerating global improvements in health care quality;Leatherman;JAMA,2020

3. World Health Organization, World Bank Group, OECD . Delivering quality health services: a global imperative for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and The World Bank, 2018.

4. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution

5. United Nations millennium development goals. 2008. Available: https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ [Accessed 27 Jun 2022].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3