Understanding the interaction between support and social participation for people with physical disabilities: a scoping review protocol

Author:

Evans RebeccaORCID,Douglas JacintaORCID,Winkler DiORCID,Cubis LeeORCID

Abstract

IntroductionAround the world, the disability rights movements and the social model of disability have placed emphasis on the importance of social participation for people with disability. People with physical disability who have high and complex support needs often need support to access their communities, however, very little is known about the interaction between support and social participation for this population of people. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to explore the literature related to the interaction between support and social participation for adults with disability and understand any existing gaps in the literature where further research may be required in order to maximise quality support and social participation.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be conducted and reported according to scoping review guidelines outlined by Arksey and O’Malley and later modified by Levacet al, as well as the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Reviews. Thorough database searches will be conducted across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus. The search will be limited to papers published in English from 2013 onwards. Citations will be uploaded into Covidence and screened by two independent reviewers. Data extraction will extract data regarding participants, housing, support and study characteristics, as well as qualitative and quantitative data relevant to the research question. A narrative synthesis will be used to summarise findings. A minimum of three consultants with lived experience of disability will be engaged to review and contribute to the final scoping review paper.Ethics and disseminationIt is anticipated that the findings of this scoping review will be made available in peer-reviewed publications and also in plain language formats to ensure accessibility to a wide range of audiences. Ethics will not be required for this scoping review.

Publisher

BMJ

Reference39 articles.

1. Environmental Barriers and Supports to Everyday Participation: A Qualitative Insider Perspective From People With Disabilities

2. McVilly K . Fighting for the rights of Australians with disability. The University of Melbourne; 2019. Available: https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/fighting-for-the-rights-of-australians-with-disability

3. Australian Federation of Disability Organisation . Social model of disability. Australian Federation of disability Organisation. n.d. Available: https://www.afdo.org.au/social-model-of-disability/

4. Buder S , Perry R . The social model of disability explained. Social Creatures; 2021. Available: https://www.thesocialcreatures.org/thecreaturetimes/the-social-model-of-disability

5. Perspectives of self-direction: a systematic review of key areas contributing to service users' engagement and choice-making in self-directed disability services and supports;Lakhani;Health Soc Care Community,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3