Doctor! Did you Google my symptoms? A qualitative study of patient perceptions of doctors’ point-of-care information seeking

Author:

Tranter IsaacORCID,van Driel Mieke LORCID,Mitchell Ben

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore patient perceptions regarding doctors’ information seeking during consultations.Design and settingQualitative interviews with participants from six general practice waiting rooms in South East Queensland, Australia. Participants were asked about their experiences and opinions, and to comment on short videos of simulated consultations in which a doctor sought information. The interviews were analysed through a process of iterative thematic analysis using the framework of Braun and Clarke.ParticipantsThe 16 participants were purposively sampled including 5 men and 11 women from a diverse range of educational and age groups.ResultsHow a doctor’s need to look up information impacted patient impressions of competence and trust was an overarching theme. The four dominant themes include: the trust a patient has in the doctor before the consultation, whether the doctor is expected to know the answer to a question without searching, has the doctor added value to the consultation by searching and the consultation skills used in the process.ConclusionsPatient trust is fundamental to positive perceptions of general practitioners’ information seeking at the point-of-care. Communication is key to building this trust. Understanding the patient’s agenda, listening, assessing thoroughly and being honest and transparent about the need to seek information all contribute to a positive experience.

Funder

Australian Government

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Challenges and opportunities facing medical education;Densen;Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc,2011

2. Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care: a systematic review;Del Fiol;JAMA Intern Med,2014

3. University of Melbourne MU . Medicine in Australia: balancing employment and life (MABEL). MABEL wave 11 survey. Melbourne, 2020.

4. Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes

5. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Trust in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review;Pain Studies and Treatment;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3