Engagement with healthcare providers and healthcare system navigation among Australians with chronic conditions: a descriptive survey study

Author:

Zurynski YvonneORCID,Ellis Louise AORCID,Pomare ChiaraORCID,Meulenbroeks IsabelleORCID,Gillespie JamesORCID,Root Jo,Ansell JamesORCID,Holt Joanna,Wells Leanne,Braithwaite JeffreyORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesWith the rate of chronic conditions increasing globally, it is important to understand whether people with chronic conditions have the capacity to find the right care and to effectively engage with healthcare providers to optimise health outcomes.We aimed to examine associations between care navigation, engagement with health providers and having a chronic health condition among Australian adults.Design and SettingThis is a cross-sectional, 39-item online survey including the navigation and engagement subscales of the Health Literacy Questionnaire, completed in December 2018, in Australia. Binary variables (low/high health literacy) were created for each item and navigation and engagement subscale scores. Logistic regression analyses (estimating ORs) determined the associations between having a chronic condition and the navigation and engagement scores, while controlling for age, gender, level of education and income.Participants1024 Australians aged 18–88 years (mean=46.6 years; 51% female) recruited from the general population.ResultsOver half (n=605, 59.0%) of the respondents had a chronic condition, mostly back pain, mental disorders, arthritis and asthma. A greater proportion of respondents with chronic conditions had difficulty ensuring that healthcare providers understood their problems (32.2% vs 23.8%, p=0.003), having good discussions with their doctors (29.1% vs 23.5%, p=0.05), discussing things with healthcare providers until they understand all they needed (30.5% vs 24.5%, p=0.04), accessing needed healthcare providers (35.7% vs 29.7%, p=0.05), finding the right place to get healthcare services (36.3% vs 29.2%, p=0.02) and services they were entitled to (48.3% vs 40.6%, p=0.02), and working out what is the best healthcare for themselves (34.2% vs 27.7%, p=0.03). Participants with chronic conditions were 1.5 times more likely to have low scores on the engagement (adjusted OR=1.48, p=0.03, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.08) and navigation (adjusted OR=1.43, p=0.026, 95% CI 1.043 to 1.970) subscales after adjusting for age, gender, income and education.ConclusionUpskilling in engagement and communication for healthcare providers and people with chronic conditions is needed. Codesigned, clearly articulated and accessible information about service entitlements and pathways through care should be made available to people with chronic conditions. Greater integration across health services, accessible shared health records and access to care coordinators may improve navigation and engagement.

Funder

NHMRC Investigator Grant

NHMRC Partnership Centre in Health System Sustainability

Department of Health, Australian Government

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. The Health Foundation . Person-centred care made simple: what everyone should know about person-centred care. London, UK: The Health Foundation, 2016. https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/PersonCentredCareMadeSimple.pdf

2. Health Innovation Network . What is person-centred care and why is it important? London, UK: Health Innovation Network, 2019. https://healthinnovationnetwork.com/system/ckeditor_assets/attachments/41/what_is_person-centred_care_and_why_is_it_important.pdf

3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care . Person-centred care. Sydney, Australia: ACSQHC, 2021. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/partnering-consumers/person-centred-care

4. Moreira L . Health literacy for people-centred care: where do OECD countries stand? Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2018. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DELSA/HEA/WD/HWP(2018)4&docLanguage=En

5. New South Wales Government Clinical Excellence Commission . Health literacy. Sydney, Australia: NSW Government, 2021. https://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/improve-quality/person-centred-care/health-literacy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3