Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study

Author:

Craig PeterORCID,Barr Benjamin,Baxter Andrew JORCID,Brown HeatherORCID,Cheetham MandyORCID,Gibson MarciaORCID,Katikireddi Srinivasa VittalORCID,Moffatt Suzanne,Morris StephORCID,Munford Luke AaronORCID,Richiardi Matteo,Sutton Matt,Taylor-Robinson David,Wickham Sophie,Xiang HuashengORCID,Bambra Clare

Abstract

IntroductionThe UK social security system is being transformed by the implementation of Universal Credit (UC), which combines six existing benefits and tax credits into a single payment for low-income households. Despite extensive reports of hardship associated with the introduction of UC, no previous studies have comprehensively evaluated its impact on mental health. Because payments are targeted at low-income households, impacts on mental health will have important consequences for health inequalities.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a mixed methods study. Work package (WP) 1 will compare health outcomes for new recipients of UC with outcomes for legacy benefit recipients in two large population surveys, using the phased rollout of UC as a natural experiment. We will also analyse the relationship between the proportion of UC claimants in small areas and a composite measure of mental health. WP2 will use data collected by Citizen’s Advice to explore the sociodemographic and health characteristics of people who seek advice when claiming UC and identify features of the claim process that prompt advice-seeking. WP3 will conduct longitudinal in-depth interviews with up to 80 UC claimants in England and Scotland to explore reasons for claiming and experiences of the claim process. Up to 30 staff supporting claimants will also be interviewed. WP4 will use a dynamic microsimulation model to simulate the long-term health impacts of different implementation scenarios. WP5 will undertake cost–consequence analysis of the potential costs and outcomes of introducing UC and cost–benefit analyses of mitigating actions.Ethics and disseminationWe obtained ethical approval for the primary data gathering from the University of Glasgow, College of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee, application number 400200244. We will use our networks to actively disseminate findings to UC claimants, the public, practitioners and policy-makers, using a range of methods and formats.Trial registration numberThe study is registered with the Research Registry: researchregistry6697.

Funder

Public Health Research Programme

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Eurostat . Government expenditure on social protection. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Government_expenditure_on_social_protection [Accessed 6 Jan 2022].

2. Determinants of the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in mortality: a study of 17 European countries;Mackenbach;Health Place,2017

3. National Audit Office . Rolling out universal credit, 2018. Available: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Rolling-out-Universal-Credit.pdf [Accessed 6 Jan 2022].

4. Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit: a longitudinal controlled study

5. House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts . Sixty-Fourth report of session 2017-19. HC 1183, 2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3