Diabetes mellitus monitoring and control among adults in Australian general practice: a national retrospective cohort study

Author:

Zheng MingyueORCID,Bernardo CarlaORCID,Stocks NigelORCID,Hu Peng,Gonzalez-Chica DavidORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study investigated whether the monitoring and control of clinical parameters are better among patients with newly compared with past recorded diabetes diagnosis.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingMedicineInsight, a national general practice database in Australia.Participants101 875 ‘regular’ adults aged 18+ years with past recorded (2015–2016) and 9236 with newly recorded (2017) diabetes diagnosis.Main outcome measuresTwo different groups of outcomes were assessed in 2018. The first group of outcomes was the proportion of patients with clinical parameters (ie, glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, estimated glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio) monitored at least once in 2018. The second group of outcomes were those related to diabetes control in 2018 (HbA1c ≤7.0%, (BP) ≤140/90 mm Hg, total cholesterol <4.0 mmol/L and LDL-C <2.0 mmol/L). Adjusted ORs (ORadj) and adjusted probabilities (%) were obtained based on logistic regression models adjusted for practice variables and patients’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.ResultsThe study included 111 111 patients (51.7% men; mean age 65.3±15.0 years) with recorded diabetes diagnosis (11.0% of all 1 007 714 adults in the database). HbA1c was monitored in 39.2% (95% CI 36.9% to 41.6%) of patients with newly recorded and 45.2% (95% CI 42.6% to 47.8%) with past recorded diabetes (ORadj0.78, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.82). HbA1c control was achieved by 78.4% (95% CI 76.7% to 80.0%) and 54.4% (95% CI 53.4% to 55.4%) of monitored patients with newly or past recorded diabetes, respectively (ORadj3.11, 95% CI 2.82 to 3.39). Less than 20% of patients with newly or past recorded diabetes had their HbA1c, BP and total cholesterol levels controlled (ORadj1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.21).ConclusionsThe monitoring of clinical parameters was lower among patients with newly than past recorded diabetes. However, diabetes control was similarly low in both groups, with only one in five monitored patients achieving control of all clinical parameters.

Funder

University of Adelaide

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Lifestyle factors, self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care;Lambrinou;Eur J Prev Cardiol,2019

2. 10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes

3. New idf clinical practice recommendations for managing type 2 diabetes in primary care;Aschner;Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2017

4. Management status of type 2 diabetes mellitus in tertiary hospitals in Beijing: gap between guideline and reality;Li;Chin Med J (Engl),2012

5. Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Therapeutic inertia;Australian Prescriber;2024-02-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3