Evaluating the impact on health outcomes of an event that resulted in a delay in contact tracing of COVID-19 cases in England, September 2020: an observational study

Author:

Findlater LucyORCID,Pierotti Livia,Turner Charlie,Wensley Adrian,Chen CongORCID,Seaman ShaunORCID,Samartsidis PantelisORCID,Charlett AndreORCID,Anderson Charlotte,Hughes GarethORCID,Hickman MatthewORCID,Edeghere ObagheORCID,Oliver IsabelORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveIn September 2020, 15 861 SARS-CoV-2 case records failed to upload from the Second Generation Surveillance System (SGSS) to the Contact Tracing Advisory Service (CTAS) tool, delaying the contact tracing of these cases. This study used CTAS data to determine the impact of this delay on population health outcomes: transmission events, hospitalisations and mortality. Previously, a modelling study suggested a substantial impact.DesignObservational study.SettingEngland.PopulationIndividuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and their reported contacts.Main outcome measuresSecondary attack rates (SARs), hospitalisations and deaths among primary and secondary contacts were calculated, compared with all other concurrent, unaffected cases. Affected SGSS records were matched to CTAS records. Successive contacts and cases were identified and matched to hospital episode and mortality outcomes.ResultsInitiation of contact tracing was delayed by 3 days on average in the primary cases in the delay group (6 days) compared with the control group (3 days). This was associated with lower completion of contact tracing: 80% (95% CI: 79% to 81%) in delay group and 83% (95% CI: 83% to 84%) in control group. There was some evidence to suggest increased transmission to non-household contacts among those affected by the delay. The SAR for non-household contacts was higher among secondary contacts in the delay group than the control group (delay group: 7.9%, 95% CI: 6.5% to 9.2%; control group: 5.9%, 95% CI: 5.3% to 6.6%). There did not appear to be a significant difference between the delay and control groups in the odds of hospitalisation (crude OR: 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.2)) or death (crude OR: 0.7 (95% CI: 0.1 to 4.0)) among secondary contacts.ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that the delay in contact tracing had a limited impact on population health outcomes; however, contact tracing was not completed for all individuals, so some transmission events might not be captured.

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit

Programme Grants for Applied Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. UK Government . Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK. UK summary. 2021. Available: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk [Accessed 09 October 2023].

2. Public Health England . NHS test and trace. 2021. Available: https://contact-tracing.phe.gov.uk [Accessed 01 Dec 2021].

3. Public Health England . Letter from Richard Gleave, deputy chief executive of public health England, describing the use of CTAS in the COVID-19 response. 2020. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/881231/Letter_to_DsPH_on_contact_tracing.pdf [Accessed 01 Dec 2021].

4. Efficacy of contact tracing for the containment of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)

5. Public Health England . PHE statement on delayed reporting of COVID-19 cases. 2020. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phe-statement-on-delayed-reporting-of-covid-19-cases [Accessed 01 Dec 2021].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3