Abstract
IntroductionDeveloping the capabilities of individuals, groups and communities to enhance their health has received a great deal of attention in the literature. One essential source of results is evidence-based intervention programmes, which often involve a number of different variables. This paper describes a methodology for carrying out a scoping review that maps available evidence on randomised controlled trials focusing on health promotion intervention programmes.Methods and analysisThe scoping review protocol follows the general Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. It also incorporates some modifications to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review flowchart and complements its methodological framework. This new format, called documents, Concept, Studies, Participants, Interventions, Comparator, and Outcomes (d-CoSPICO), guides the review sequence, which is represented in a flowchart. The search will focus on different sources of information using formal (searches in thematic –PubPsych, ERIC, MedLine, PsychINFO– and multidisciplinary databases –Academic Search Ultimate, Core Collection Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest–, repositories and other websites), informal (contact with researchers), and retrospective (previous reviews on this topic) strategies to identify relevant publications until 2021, including grey literature. Coding, identification, selection, and data extraction will be carried out following the generation of a database in which each retrieved record’s content (abstract and/or full text) can be analysed. The review is expected to be completed in 2023.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this review. The d-CoSPICO framework and the results will be disseminated through (a) peer-reviewed publications; (b) presentations at scientific dissemination events and (c) training activities for applying this protocol.
Funder
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Reference32 articles.
1. World Health Organization . Health promotion glossary of terms 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
2. Blueprints for Europe: promoting evidence-based programmes in children’s services;Axford;Psychos Intervent,2012
3. International Union for Health Promotion and Education . The evidence of health promotion effectiveness. shaping public health in a new Europe. a report for the European commission by the international union for health promotion and education. ECSC-EC-EAEC. Brussels, Luxembourg, 2000.
4. McLean M , Madden L , Maxwell J , et al . Planetary health: educating the current and future health workforce. In: Nestel D , Reedy G , McKenna L , et al ., eds. Clinical education for the health professions: theory and practice. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020: 1–30. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7
5. World Health Organization . Health promotion evaluation: recommendations to policymakers. In: Report of the WHO European working group on health promotion evaluation. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, 1998.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献